Technological impact of funded research: A case study of nonpatent references

被引:0
|
作者
Quemener, Justin [1 ,2 ]
Miotti, Luis [1 ]
Maddi, Abdelghani [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hceres, Observ Sci & Tech, Paris, France
[2] Univ Cote dAzur, Nice, France
[3] Sorbonne Univ, GEMASS, CNRS, Paris, France
来源
QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES | 2024年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
citation impact; knowledge flow; nonpatent literature; nonpatent references; research funding; technological impact; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PATENT CITATIONS; SCIENCE; INNOVATION; LINKAGES;
D O I
10.1162/qss_a_00281
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Research funding is essential to expand knowledge, foster innovation, and address the complex challenges that shape our future. The scientific literature has extensively addressed the relationship between research funding and academic impact. More recently, several studies have analyzed the technological impact of funded research as measured through citations in patents, known as nonpatent references (NPRs). But there remains much to know about NPRs and the multiplication of case studies is necessary to characterize them. Here we analyze a sample of 7,065 publications funded by the French Foundation for Medical Research (FRM) and the citations of these publications in patents. This study shows the high scientific and technological impacts of FRM funding. Indeed, the publications funded by FRM that are cited in patents are 3.5 times more frequently cited by other publications than the global average (for funded publications in the entire database, this ratio is 2.6). Furthermore, our results also indicate that USPTO patents citing these publications exhibit high-quality indicators. Moreover, five of these patents have led to approved drug products by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This study provides further evidence of the positive influence that research funding can have on both scientific and technological advancements.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 186
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Median age difference of references as indicator of information update of research groups: A case study in Spanish food research
    Amat, C. B.
    Yegros Yegros, A.
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2009, 78 (03) : 447 - 465
  • [32] On the societal impact of publicly funded Circular Bioeconomy research in Europe
    Brandao, Ana Sofia
    Santos, Jose M. R. C. A.
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2023, 32 (02) : 441 - 457
  • [33] Measuring the economic impact of publicly funded research in Northern Canada
    Carr, Katrina
    Natcher, David
    Olfert, Rose
    POLAR GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 36 (04) : 291 - 304
  • [34] Median age difference of references as indicator of information update of research groups: A case study in Spanish food research
    C. B. Amat
    A. Yegros Yegros
    Scientometrics, 2009, 78 : 447 - 465
  • [35] Viewpoint: Aligning vision and reality in publicly funded agricultural research for development: A case study of CGIAR
    Thornton, Philip
    Dijkman, Jeroen
    Herrero, Mario
    Szilagyi, Lili
    Cramer, Laura
    FOOD POLICY, 2022, 107
  • [36] Inclusion of female participants in cardiovascular research: a case study of Ontario NSERC-funded programs
    Wilson, Ria
    Adams, Mary Louise
    Pyke, Kyra E.
    APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2020, 45 (08) : 911 - 914
  • [37] The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council
    Kramer, Bianca
    de Jonge, Hans
    QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 2022, 3 (03): : 583 - 599
  • [38] ANTARCTICA - A STUDY IN TECHNOLOGICAL IMPACT
    DATER, HM
    ANTARCTIC JOURNAL OF THE UNITED STATES, 1970, 5 (04): : 145 - &
  • [39] RESEARCH IN TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION - A MAJOR INSTRUMENT OF THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES AND INNOVATION
    Stroe, C.
    Militaru, E.
    Cojanu, S.
    Lungu, E. O.
    MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES, BOOK 2, 2011, : 601 - 603
  • [40] University Autonomy and Commercialization of Publicly Funded Research: the Case of Latvia
    Lauma Muizniece
    Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2021, 12 : 1494 - 1516