Optimizing CO2 Purification in a Negative CO2 Emission Power Plant

被引:2
|
作者
Amiri, Milad [1 ]
Mikielewicz, Jaroslaw [2 ]
Ziolkowski, Pawel [1 ]
Mikielewicz, Dariusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Gdansk Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn & Ship Technol, Ul Gabriela Narutowicza 11-12, PL-80233 Gdansk, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Fluid Flow Machinery, Ul Fiszera 14, PL-80231 Gdansk, Poland
关键词
Computational fluid dynamics; Cyclone separator; Gas-liquid separation; Separation efficiency; Vanes; SEPARATION PERFORMANCE; FLOW-FIELD; CYCLONE; CFD; IMPACT; ENERGY; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1002/ceat.202300568
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In the pursuit of mitigating CO2 emissions, this study investigates the optimization of CO2 purification within a negative CO2 emission power plant using a spray ejector condenser (SEC) coupled with a separator. The approach involves direct-contact condensation of vapor, primarily composed of an inert gas (CO2), facilitated by a subcooled liquid spray. A comprehensive analysis is presented, employing a numerical model to simulate a cyclone separator under various SEC outlet conditions. Methodologically, the simulation, conducted in Fluent, encompasses three-dimensional, transient, and turbulent characteristics using the Reynolds stress model turbulent model and mixture model to replicate the turbulent two-phase flow within a gas-liquid separator. Structural considerations are delved into, evaluating the efficacy of single- and dual-inlet separators to enhance CO2 purification efficiency. The study reveals significant insights into the optimization process, highlighting a notable enhancement in separation efficiency within the dual-inlet cyclone, compared to its single inlet counterpart. Specifically, a 90.7 % separation efficiency is observed in the former, characterized by symmetrical flow patterns devoid of wavering CO2 cores, whereas the latter exhibits less desirable velocity vectors. Furthermore, the investigation explores the influence of key parameters, such as liquid volume fraction (LVF) and water droplet diameter, on separation efficiency. It is ascertained that a 10 % LVF with a water droplet diameter of 10 mu m yields the highest separation efficiency at 90.7 %, whereas a 20 % LVF with a water droplet diameter of 1 mu m results in a reduced efficiency of 50.79 %. Moreover, the impact of structural modifications, such as the addition of vanes, on separation efficiency and pressure drop is explored. Remarkably, the incorporation of vanes leads to a 9.2 % improvement in separation efficiency and a 16.8 % reduction in pressure drop at a 10 % LVF. The findings underscore the significance of structural considerations and parameter optimization in advancing CO2 capture technologies, with implications for sustainable energy production and environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pilot power plant reuses waste CO2
    Johnson, Jeff
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2016, 94 (12) : 19 - 19
  • [32] POWER PLANT CO2 MITIGATION IN THE MICROALGAE PONDS
    Sayaner, Okan
    Gur, Ibrahim
    Firat, Coskun
    12TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC GEOCONFERENCE, SGEM 2012, VOL. IV, 2012, : 379 - 386
  • [33] Tackling CO2 issues by chemical conversion and by reducing CO2 emission
    Chen, Jingguang
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [34] HYBRID POWER GENERATION PLANT FOR CO2 CAPTURE
    Deng, Shimin
    Hynes, Rory
    Drover, Brian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND THE ASME 2012 POWER CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 4, 2012, : 763 - 770
  • [35] CO2 partial pressure and CO2 emission in the Lower Mekong River
    Li, Siyue
    Lu, X. X.
    Bush, Richard T.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 504 : 40 - 56
  • [36] PULVERIZED COAL COMBUSTION IN O-2 CO2 MIXTURES ON A POWER-PLANT FOR CO2 RECOVERY
    NAKAYAMA, S
    NOGUCHI, Y
    KIGA, T
    MIYAMAE, S
    MAEDA, U
    KAWAI, M
    TANAKA, T
    KOYATA, K
    MAKINO, H
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1992, 33 (5-8) : 379 - 386
  • [37] Trial design for a CO2 recovery power plant by burning pulverized coal in O-2/CO2
    Okawa, M
    Kimura, N
    Kiga, T
    Takano, S
    Arai, K
    Kato, M
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 : S123 - S127
  • [38] To CO2 or not to CO2 ,that is the question!
    Hohnadel, DC
    Gruttadauria, M
    Murray, K
    Levin, M
    D'Souza, J
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (06) : A90 - A90
  • [39] Detectability of CO2 emission plumes of cities and power plants with the Copernicus Anthropogenic CO2 Monitoring (CO2M) mission
    Kuhlmann, Gerrit
    Broquet, Gregoire
    Marshall, Julia
    Clement, Valentin
    Loscher, Armin
    Meijer, Yasjka
    Brunner, Dominik
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2019, 12 (12) : 6695 - 6719
  • [40] Emission studies from a CO2 capture pilot plant
    da Silva, Eirik F.
    Kolderup, Herman
    Goetheer, Earl
    Hjarbo, Kai W.
    Huizinga, Arjen
    Khakharia, Purvil
    Tuinman, Ilse
    Mejdell, Thor
    Zahlsen, Kolbjorn
    Vernstad, Kai
    Hyldbakk, Astrid
    Holten, Torunn
    Kvamsdal, Hanne M.
    van Os, Peter
    Einbu, Aslak
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 778 - 783