Diversification of marine aquaculture in Norway under climate change

被引:1
|
作者
Falconer, Lynne [1 ]
Sparboe, Lars Olav [2 ]
Dale, Trine [3 ]
Hjollo, Solfrid Saetre [4 ,5 ]
Stavrakidis-Zachou, Orestis [6 ]
Bergh, Oivind [4 ]
James, Philip [7 ]
Papandroulakis, Nikos [6 ]
Puvanendran, Velmurugu [7 ]
Siikavuopio, Sten Ivar [7 ]
Hansen, Oyvind Johannes [7 ]
Ytteborg, Elisabeth [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Inst Aquaculture, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[2] Akvaplan niva, Hjalmar Johansens Gate 14, N-9007 Tromso, Norway
[3] Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, Thormohlengate 53 D, N-5006 Bergen, Norway
[4] Inst Marine Res, Box 1870 Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway
[5] Bjerknes Ctr Climate Res, Bergen, Norway
[6] HCMR, Inst Marine Biol Biotechnol & Aquaculture, AquaLabs, Iraklion, Greece
[7] Nofima, Muninbakken 9-13,Box 6122 Langnes, NO-9291 Tromso, Norway
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Aquaculture readiness level; ARL (R); Challenging conditions index; CCI; Climate action; Species diversification; TEMPERATURE; GROWTH; TOLERANCE; SHIFTS; OXYGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.741350
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Recently there has been increased interest in species diversification in aquaculture as a strategy to adapt to climate change. Since species diversification is a long-term strategy, climate change and future farming conditions must be considered. The aim of this study was to evaluate how changing temperatures under different IPCC climate scenarios may affect marine aquaculture species diversification in Norway. Since farm conditions vary between locations, this study focused on four geographic areas (South, West, North and Arctic) and three farms within each area. Using a climate model downscaling of three climate scenarios (Shared Socioeconomic Pathways; SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5), daily temperatures from the years 2020-2099 were evaluated at each farm location to identify challenging conditions for 34 species. A Challenging Conditions Index (CCI) was developed based on species thermal tolerances to compare the 34 potential aquaculture species. The results showed differences in the number of challenging days (hot and cold) between areas, and even within areas, highlighting the need to consider site-specific conditions. For warm-water species more commonly farmed in the Mediterranean (e.g. European seabass, gilthead seabream), the calibrated model projections at the investigated Norwegian farm sites suggest that cold temperatures would still be challenging. Differences in the number of challenging days between the climate scenarios become more apparent towards the mid and end of century, though all scenarios show interannual variation rather than a constant change in conditions over time. Hence, any species selected for diversification purposes will have to be able to tolerate a range of temperature conditions, and species with narrower tolerance ranges could be a risk. These findings underline the importance of considering the interannually varying conditions that species will be exposed to rather than focusing solely on long-term averages. Establishing a new large-scale commercial aquaculture species takes a considerable amount of time and resources. Therefore, to support interpretation of the results and further studies on diversification under climate change, this study also introduces Aquaculture Readiness Level (ARL (R)) as a consistent evaluation of the research and development status, progress towards commercialisation and climate action orientated production. As species will have to be able to tolerate a range of temperature conditions over different years, the level of knowledge, resources, and innovation will have to be continually enhanced to improve adaptive capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] International diversification of investments in climate change mitigation
    Springer, U
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (01) : 181 - 193
  • [42] Portfolio diversification of investments in climate change mitigation
    Michaelowa, A
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2006, 5 (05) : 563 - 564
  • [43] Climate change and marine plankton
    Hays, GC
    Richardson, AJ
    Robinson, C
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2005, 20 (06) : 337 - 344
  • [44] CLIMATE CHANGE AND MARINE FISHERIES
    FRANCIS, RC
    FISHERIES, 1990, 15 (06) : 7 - 9
  • [45] Climate change and marine vertebrates
    Sydeman, William J.
    Poloczanska, Elvira
    Reed, Thomas E.
    Thompson, Sarah Ann
    SCIENCE, 2015, 350 (6262) : 772 - 777
  • [46] The Climate Change and Marine Biodiversity
    Yazdi, Soheila Khoshnevis
    Shakouri, Bahram
    BIOLOGY, ENVIRONMENT AND CHEMISTRY, 2011, : 257 - 261
  • [47] Climate change and marine ecosystems
    Chavez, Francisco P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (47) : 19045 - 19046
  • [48] Climate change and marine life
    Richardson, Anthony J.
    Brown, Christopher J.
    Brander, Keith
    Bruno, John F.
    Buckley, Lauren
    Burrows, Michael T.
    Duarte, Carlos M.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Hoegh-Guldberg, Ove
    Holding, Johnna
    Kappel, Carrie V.
    Kiessling, Wolfgang
    Moore, Pippa J.
    O'Connor, Mary I.
    Pandolfi, John M.
    Parmesan, Camille
    Schoeman, David S.
    Schwing, Frank
    Sydeman, William J.
    Poloczanska, Elvira S.
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 8 (06) : 907 - 909
  • [49] CLIMATE CHANGE AND MARINE ECOSYSTEM
    Ishizaka, J.
    NETWORKING THE WORLD WITH REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 38 : 23 - 24
  • [50] Coastal Vulnerability Impact Assessment under Climate Change in the Arctic Coasts of Tromsø, Norway
    Toumasi, Polyxeni
    Petropoulos, George P.
    Detsikas, Spyridon E.
    Kalogeropoulos, Kleomenis
    Tselos, Nektarios Georgios
    EARTH, 2024, 5 (04): : 640 - 653