What is the role of cross-ownership in corporate digital innovation: "stepping stone" or "hindrance"?

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Maochun [1 ]
Niu, Yuhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Tech Univ, Huludao, Peoples R China
关键词
Cross-ownership; Digital innovation; Information asymmetry; Financing constraints; Governance synergistic effects; EXTERNALITIES; GOVERNANCE; WORLD;
D O I
10.1108/BPMJ-09-2023-0746
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the impact of cross-ownership on corporate digital innovation and their specific mechanisms. Cross-ownership, who hold equity in two or more companies simultaneously, have two different types of governance effects in the capital market: governance synergistic effects and competitive collusion effects.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses a panel model, selecting A-share company data from 2011 to 2021 in China. In total, 23,853 valid data were obtained, which came from the CSMAR database and Wind database. For some missing data, they were manually supplemented by consulting the company's annual report and Sina Finance. Data processing was conducted using EXCEL and Stata16.0 software.FindingsThe results show that cross-ownership promote corporate digital innovation by leveraging governance synergies. Further grouping tests show that the synergistic effects of cross-ownership are significant in non-state-owned, high-tech, weakly competitive and higher analyst attention enterprises. Mechanism testing shows that cross-ownership can empower corporate digital innovation in three ways: reducing information asymmetry, alleviating financing constraints and improving corporate governance.Originality/valueThe conclusion of this paper provides new empirical evidence for a comprehensive understanding of the role of cross-ownership in corporate development, enriches the economic consequences research of chain institutional investors in China and broadens the research perspective of corporate digital innovation. It also provides important references for the digital transformation of enterprises and the healthy development of the capital market.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Institutional cross-ownership and corporate philanthropy
    Fu, Yishu
    Qin, Zhenjiang
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 43
  • [2] Cross-ownership and corporate social responsibility
    Barcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos
    Sagasta, Amagoia
    MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2021, 89 (04): : 367 - 384
  • [3] The power of sharing: Evidence from institutional investor cross-ownership and corporate innovation
    Gao, Kaijuan
    Shen, Hanxiao
    Gao, Xi
    Chan, Kam C.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2019, 63 : 284 - 296
  • [4] Cross-ownership and corporate ESG investment: Promotion or suppression?
    Zhou, Maochun
    Niu, Yuhua
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (05) : 4612 - 4629
  • [5] Stock markets are not what we think they are: the key roles of cross-ownership and corporate treasury stock
    Roehner, BM
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2005, 347 : 613 - 625
  • [6] Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: The case of mergers and acquisitions
    Brooks, Chris
    Chen, Zhong
    Zeng, Yeqin
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 48 : 187 - 216
  • [7] Corporate financing of investment opportunities in a world of institutional cross-ownership
    Chen, Yangyang
    Li, Qingyuan
    Ng, Jeffrey
    Wang, Chong
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 69
  • [8] Internalizing governance externalities: The role of institutional cross-ownership
    He, Jie
    Huang, Jiekun
    Zhao, Shan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 134 (02) : 400 - 418
  • [9] Political connections and corporate innovation: A stepping stone or stumbling block?
    Zhao, Hongjun
    Ni, Jinlan
    Liu, Xiaomin
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 89 : 310 - 326
  • [10] Cross-ownership and strategic environmental corporate social responsibility under price competition
    Xing, Mingqing
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2024, 29 (03) : 234 - 256