The Functional Outcome of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 (PFNA-2) in Peritrochanteric Fractures of the Femur

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, Gagandeep [1 ]
Kumar, Anoop [2 ]
Bhat, Mohhamad Farooq [2 ]
Thakur, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Ophthalmol, Vijaypur, Jammu, India
[2] Govt Med Coll & Hosp, Orthoped, Jammu, India
关键词
pfn-a2; modified harris hip score; peritrochanteric fractures; subtrochanteric fractures; intertrochanteric fractures; SUBTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; FIXATION;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.64839
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Peritrochanteric fractures are defined as extra-articular fractures involving the trochanter and frequent extension into the subtrochanteric region. These fractures exhibit a bimodal distribution in terms of age. These fractures commonly happen in young individuals who experience high-energy trauma, often in combination with other injuries. In contrast, elderly individuals with osteopenia are more prone to fractures caused by low-energy trauma. Methods This study is a prospective investigation that was carried out over 30 months. The study focused on peritrochanteric fractures that were treated using proximal femoral nail antirotation-2 (PFNA-2) as a fixation device. A range of criteria were examined and documented, encompassing the mean duration of surgical procedures, blood loss, the duration of hospitalization, mobility, and any potential post-operative problems. Subsequent assessments were conducted at fixed intervals of two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and two years. The functional outcome analysis for all patients involved the utilization of the modified Harris hip score (HHS). Results The study involved 60 cases of peritrochanteric fractures. The average age was 56 years. The most common mode of trauma was trivial fall/slip (46.66%), followed by road traffic accidents (RTA) (31.66%) and falls from height (21.66%). The average operating time was 53.03 +/- 5.66 minutes. The average modified Harris hip score was 84.78 with 26.66% excellent, 70% good, and 3.33% fair results. Complications included superficial wound infection (5%), knee stiffness (11.66%), hip pain (8.33%), and shortening (1.66%). Conclusion PFNA-2 is a safe and easy implant option for treating peritrochanteric fractures as it preserves periosteal covering, minimizes blood loss, has a short operative time, and helps in early mobilization. PFNA-2 provides excellent outcomes in patients with peritrochanteric fractures with minimum complication rates compared to all other open methods and is highly recommendable.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Treatment of bilateral simultaneous subtrochanteric femur fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in a patient with osteopetrosis: case report and review of the literature
    Kumbaraci, Mert
    Karapinar, Levent
    Incesu, Mustafa
    Kaya, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (03) : 486 - 489
  • [22] AO/OTA 31A2 and 31A3 Intertrochanteric Fractures Managed by Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)
    Tunio, Zamir Hussain
    Jhatiyal, Rizwan Ali
    Akhund, Muhammad Azeem
    Abbasi, Muhammad Kashif
    Ali, Syed Muhammad
    Jokhio, Muhammad Faraz
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (10): : 2616 - 2618
  • [23] BIOMECHANICAL STUDY ON PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION (PFNA) FOR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE
    Wang, Lizhen
    Zhao, Feng
    Han, Jingyun
    Wang, Chao
    Fan, Yubo
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 12 (04)
  • [24] Treatment of basicervical femoral neck fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation
    Guo, Jialiang
    Dong, Weichong
    Jin, Lin
    Yin, Yingchao
    Zhang, Ruipeng
    Hou, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Yingze
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (09) : 4333 - 4343
  • [25] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Yanfeng Huang
    Chunlin Zhang
    Yi Luo
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 2465 - 2473
  • [26] Comparison between Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and Dynamic Condylar Screw (DCS) in the Management of Unstable Proximal Femur Fractures in Term of Mean Union Time
    Akhtar, Muhammad Saleem
    Gillani, Haroon Ur Rehman
    Khan, Kashif Raza
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 10 (02): : 555 - 558
  • [27] Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus Gamma nail in treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures
    Yan, Denglu
    Soon, Yancheng
    Lv, Yuming
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2012, 23 (04): : 346 - 350
  • [28] The Asia proximal femoral nail antirotation versus the standard proximal femoral antirotation nail for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese patients
    Li, J.
    Cheng, L.
    Jing, J.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (02) : 143 - 146
  • [29] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Huang, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Chunlin
    Luo, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (12) : 2465 - 2473
  • [30] Comparison of radiological and functional outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA-2 in patients with osteoporosis
    Sharan Mallya
    Surendra U. Kamath
    Arkesh Madegowda
    Sunil Lakshmipura Krishnamurthy
    Manesh Kumar Jain
    Ramesh Holla
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019, 29 : 1035 - 1042