Teachers' experiences of enacting pedagogical models and models-based practice: a systematic mixed study review

被引:2
|
作者
Casey, Ashley [1 ]
Bjorke, Lars [2 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Sch Sport Exercise & Hlth Sci, Loughborough, England
[2] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Sport Sci, Hamarvegen 112, N-2406 Elverum, Norway
关键词
Pedagogical growth; classroom democracy; professional development; curricular alignment; enactment challenges; PHYSICAL-EDUCATION; HOPE;
D O I
10.1080/17408989.2024.2415325
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe shift from traditional, teacher-led methods towards more student-centred approaches in many countries has positioned pedagogical models and Models-based Practice (MbP) as a potential future for physical education pedagogy. Over the last 10-15 years there has been a surge in publications reporting on teachers' experiences of enacting models. These studies have not, until now, been synthesised. Such a synthesis would allow a richer, more nuanced and holistic understanding of teachers' experiences of enacting pedagogical models in physical education. This understanding helps to provide a robust evidence base from which to consider the usefulness of pedagogical models and MbP as a future physical education pedagogy.PurposeThe purpose of this review is to explore and synthesise teachers' experiences of enacting pedagogical models in literature from 2010 to 2022. In doing this we set out to answer the question: What are teachers' reported experiences of enacting pedagogical models and/or models-based practice?MethodsThis study employed a systematic mixed study approach to analyse empirical examples of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research published between 1st January 2010 and 31st October 2022. The selection process involved a comprehensive search strategy across four databases (SportDiscus, ERIC, Web of Science, Scopus), title and abstract screening, full-text evaluation, the use of the mixed methods assessment tool and a synthesis of the findings from the 91 included studies.ResultsThe findings highlighted five themes related to teachers' experiences of enacting pedagogical models: (1) developing democratic classrooms through pedagogical models, (2) enacting pedagogical models for professional growth, (3) strengthening student learning within and beyond the physical domain, (4) aligning curricula through pedagogical models, and (5) challenging the current state of physical education through pedagogical models. Results reveal teachers' efforts to democratise the classroom environment where students, regardless of their ability, were given equal opportunities. This democratisation occurred alongside teachers' pedagogical growth but was not without its challenges. The review underscores the multifaceted challenges of integrating pedagogical models into diverse educational contexts. Teachers report on the need for investment in professional development and the garnering of other professional support to be able to negotiate and adapt pedagogical models to the curricular aspirations in local contexts. Importantly, the review highlights how many teachers reported that their use of pedagogical models allowed them to extend student learning beyond the physical domain.DiscussionThe review makes an important, original and innovative contribution to understanding and knowledge in the field by highlighting the potential of pedagogical models to enrich physical education pedagogy by fostering more inclusive, reflective, and dynamic learning environments. It critically examines the barriers in the enactment of pedagogical models, ranging from infrastructural limitations to the intricacies of using pedagogical models in practice. The paper, therefore, highlights the need for supportive frameworks for teachers implementing pedagogical models that emphasises continuous learning and collaboration. In conclusion, we ask if pedagogical models are destined to remain a lofty ideal, or if there is a need to recalibrate our scholarly compass, broadening our research horizons to envisage a more inclusive and diverse future for physical education?
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Execution of UML models: a systematic review of research and practice
    Ciccozzi, Federico
    Malavolta, Ivano
    Selic, Bran
    SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2019, 18 (03): : 2313 - 2360
  • [32] Execution of UML models: a systematic review of research and practice
    Federico Ciccozzi
    Ivano Malavolta
    Bran Selic
    Software & Systems Modeling, 2019, 18 : 2313 - 2360
  • [33] Effectiveness of child protection practice models: a systematic review
    Isokuortti, Nanne
    Aaltio, Elina
    Laajasalo, Taina
    Barlow, Jane
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2020, 108
  • [34] Another Step in Models-based Practice: Hybridizing Cooperative Learning and Teaching for Personal and Social Responsibility
    Fernandez-Rio, Javier
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION RECREATION AND DANCE, 2014, 85 (07): : 3 - 5
  • [35] An advanced deep learning models-based plant disease detection: A review of recent research
    Shoaib, Muhammad
    Shah, Babar
    EI-Sappagh, Shaker
    Ali, Akhtar
    Ullah, Asad
    Alenezi, Fayadh
    Gechev, Tsanko
    Hussain, Tariq
    Ali, Farman
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2023, 14
  • [36] Exploring alternative practice placement models in occupational therapy and physiotherapy: perspectives and experiences of learners and practice educators: a qualitative systematic review
    Deaves, Amanda
    Matson, Rebecca
    Rushe, Edwina
    Rees, Anna
    Edwards, David
    Trainor, Kate
    Seddon, Joanne
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [37] Between hope and happening: Problematizing the M and the P in Models-based Practice (Jul, 10.1080/17408989.2020.1789576, 2020)
    Casey, Ashley
    MacPhail, Ann
    Larsson, Hakan
    Quennerstedt, Mikael
    PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT PEDAGOGY, 2021, 26 (02) : III - III
  • [38] Finding the place of content and language integrated learning in physical education within the models-based practice framework
    Salvador-Garcia, Celina
    Chiva-Bartoll, Oscar
    Hortiguela-Alcala, David
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2024, 30 (01) : 3 - 18
  • [39] Systematic review: Health care transition practice service models
    Betz, Cecily L.
    O'Kane, Lisa S.
    Nehring, Wendy M.
    Lobo, Marie L.
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2016, 64 (03) : 229 - 243
  • [40] Fine-tuning and prompt engineering for large language models-based code review automation
    Pornprasit, Chanathip
    Tantithamthavorn, Chakkrit
    INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 175