Multiphysics analysis of flow uniformity and stack/manifold configuration in a kilowatt-class multistack solid oxide electrolysis cell module

被引:2
|
作者
Yang, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zepeng [1 ]
Wang, Yanfeng [3 ]
Miao, He [2 ]
Yuan, Jinliang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Merchant Marine Coll, Shanghai Frontiers Sci Ctr Full Penetrat Far reach, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Ningbo Univ, Fac Maritime & Transportat, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Xian, Shanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs); Kilowatt-class multistack module; flow uniformity index; Multiphysics; Cascade; FUEL-CELL; POROUS-MEDIA; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; OPTIMIZATION; NONUNIFORM; MANAGEMENT; HYDROGEN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2024.132627
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) can convert excess electrical energy into hydrogen at high temperatures. However, widespread implementation of SOECs is impeded by performance degradation and reliability issues at large-sized stacks. The magnification effects of heat, flow, and reactions within the stacks are necessary to address the limitations. In this study, we focus on a 12 kW multistack module comprising four short stacks, each containing 24 cells. A novel numerical approach based on distributed resistance analogy is employed to predict the multiphysics transport phenomena at the multistack module level. The effects of varying cell/stack numbers on the uniformity of multiphysics are investigated. A distributed gas supply method is introduced to achieve even distribution of gaseous flow across different stacks. Notably, increasing the number of short-stacks enhances flow and temperature uniformities compared to single long-stack configurations. A unified buffer chamber is proposed to decrease the temperature difference to 42.2 K for the magnified mutlistack module. The flow uniformity index of a dual-stack module (2 stacks x 48 cells) exhibits a remarkable 17.1 % improvement over that of a single long- stack (1 stack x 96 cells). A four-stack module (4 stacks x 24 cells) demonstrates a 6.7 % increase in flow uniformity index compared to the dual-stack configuration.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Optimization of manifold design for 1 kW-class flat-tubular solid oxide fuel cell stack operating on reformed natural gas
    Rashid, Kashif
    Dong, Sang Keun
    Khan, Rashid Ali
    Park, Seung Hwan
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2016, 327 : 638 - 652
  • [22] Numerical Analysis of Gas Distribution in 1000 W-Class Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack With Internal and External Manifolding
    Blesznowski, M.
    Boiski, M.
    Kupecki, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (07):
  • [23] New design and performance evaluation of 1 kW-class reversible solid oxide electrolysis-fuel cell stack using flat-tubular cells
    Choi, Yoonseok
    Byun, Segi
    Seo, Doo Won
    Hwang, Hyo Jung
    Kim, Tae Woo
    Kim, Sun-Dong
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2022, 542
  • [24] Thermal and Electrical Analysis in a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Stack Using a Curved Profile for the Inlet Flow Rate Along the Stacking Direction
    Lee, Hsien-Ming
    Yuan, Ping
    Liu, Syu-Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY, 2015, 12 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [25] Electrochemical Analysis of an Electrolyte-Supported Solid Oxide Cell-Based MK35x Stack during Long-Term Electrolysis Operation
    Riegraf, Matthias
    Szabo, Patric
    Lang, Michael
    Costa, Remi
    Rothe, Stefan
    Megel, Stefan
    Kusnezoff, Mihails
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 171 (05)
  • [26] Numerical modeling of interconnect flow channel design and thermal stress analysis of a planar anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell stack
    Wei, S. -S.
    Wang, T. -H.
    Wu, J. -S.
    ENERGY, 2014, 69 : 553 - 561
  • [27] Modeling and analysis of cross-flow solid oxide electrolysis cell with oxygen electrode/electrolyte interface oxygen pressure characteristics for hydrogen production
    Xia, Zhiping
    Deng, Zhonghua
    Jiang, Chang
    Zhao, Dong-qi
    Kupecki, Jakub
    Wu, Xiao-long
    Xu, Yuan-wu
    Liu, Guo-qiang
    Fu, Xiaowei
    Li, Xi
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2022, 529