Seismic performance assessment of stone masonry buildings: Efficacy of various strengthening elements

被引:0
|
作者
Ban, Sabin [1 ]
Shrestha, Kshitij C. [1 ]
Bastola, Subash [1 ]
机构
[1] Tribhuvan Univ, Inst Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Pulchowk Campus, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal
来源
关键词
Rubble stone masonry; Pushover analysis; Capacity spectrum method; Fragility analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110380
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Post the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal, various codes and guidelines were introduced and implemented to enhance the seismic resistance of masonry structures. These provisions encompass diverse seismic measures such as incorporating horizontal bands and vertical reinforcements to fortify structures against seismic forces. Nevertheless, a comprehensive investigation and validation of effectiveness of horizontal bands and vertical reinforcement on the performance of such buildings is still lacking. This paper addresses this gap by presenting the seismic fragility assessment of stone masonry buildings constructed with mud mortar (SMM) and cement mortar (SMC), with a case study involving three distinct building prototypes, presented in the catalogue by the Department of Urban Development and Building Construction (DUDBC), Nepal. The research evaluates the effectiveness of several strengthening components on the buildings' performance, making comparisons among four different scenarios: (a) RM (a reinforced model with all horizontal bands, vertical reinforcement, and through stones), (b) RM-WOV (a reinforced model excluding vertical reinforcement), (c) RM-WOV-St (a reinforced model excluding vertical reinforcement and stitches), and (d) URM (an unreinforced model lacking all horizontal bands, vertical reinforcement, and through stones). The cracking mechanisms reveals the importance of the horizontal bands and through stones. The fragility analysis performed for slight, moderate, extensive and collapse damage states shows that unreinforced models are more susceptible than their reinforced counterparts, irrespective of whether mud or cement mortar is used. The maximum reduction in probability of exceedance of collapse and extensive damage for SMM and SMC buildings with the introduction of horizontal bands at sill and lintel level together with through stones are around 82 % and 81 % respectively. This shows that horizontal bands at sill and lintel level play an important role in preventing the damage of the buildings. Furthermore, it is found that the effect of using vertical reinforcement and horizontal stitches is minimal in preventing the structural damage in cement mortar buildings. However, for mud mortar buildings, these measures have a noticeable effect.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF UNREINFORCED STONE MASONRY BUILDINGS: LITERATURE REVIEW AND APPLICATION TO NEW ZEALAND
    Giaretton, Marta
    Dizhur, Dmytro
    da Porto, Francesca
    Ingham, Jason M.
    BULLETIN OF THE NEW ZEALAND SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 49 (02): : 148 - 174
  • [32] Seismic assessment of existing and strengthened stone-masonry buildings: critical issues and possible strategies
    A. Penna
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 13 : 1051 - 1071
  • [33] Explicit Method in the Seismic Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings through Plane Stress Elements
    Nochebuena-Mora, Elesban
    Mendes, Nuno
    Calixto, Valentina
    Oliveira, Sandra
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (19):
  • [34] System-level seismic resilience assessment of reinforced masonry shear wall buildings with masonry boundary elements
    Hosseinzadeh, Shadman
    Galal, Khaled
    STRUCTURES, 2020, 26 : 686 - 702
  • [35] Seismic Performance Assessment of Reinforced Masonry Core Walls with Boundary Elements
    Mahrous, Amgad
    AbdelRahman, Belal
    Galal, Khaled
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2023, VOL 11, CSCE 2023, 2024, 505 : 411 - 426
  • [36] Stone masonry buildings: Analysis of structural acoustic and energy performance within the seismic safety criteria
    Schiavi, Alessandro
    Cellai, Gianfranco
    Secchi, Simone
    Brocchi, Fabio
    Grazzini, Alessandro
    Prato, Andrea
    Mazzoleni, Fabrizio
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 220 : 29 - 42
  • [37] Experimental seismic performance of a reduce-scale stone masonry loess cave with traditional buildings
    Xiangbi Zhao
    Jianyang Xue
    Fengliang Zhang
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20 : 5233 - 5267
  • [38] Experimental seismic performance of a reduce-scale stone masonry loess cave with traditional buildings
    Zhao, Xiangbi
    Xue, Jianyang
    Zhang, Fengliang
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (10) : 5233 - 5267
  • [39] Numerical Assessment of the Seismic Performance of a Timber Retrofit Solution for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
    Damiani, Nicolo
    Miglietta, M.
    Guerrini, G.
    Graziotti, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2023, 17 (01) : 114 - 133
  • [40] Seismic isolation, strengthening of walls with CFRP strips and heritage masonry buildings
    Tomazevic, M.
    Klemenc, I.
    Weiss, P.
    STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF HISTORIC CONSTRUCTION: PRESERVING SAFETY AND SIGNIFICANCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 789 - 797