With some recent exceptions, demands for global reparations have largely been ignored by former colonial countries. While the past two decades has seen renewed interest in colonial reparations in normative political theory and philosophy, this work has focused on determining responsibility for redress. By contrast, relatively little has been said on the further question of how redress might be sought in face of persistent colonial amnesia and apologia. This paper defends expropriation-unilateral public takeovers of ownership and/or control of foreign assets-as a justified response to overdue colonial reparations. In making this case, the paper (1) moves our focus beyond questions of responsibility for reparative justice to consider what victims of past injustice (and/or their descendants) are justified in doing to obtain their due and (2) explores distinctive issues that arise for political resistance at the global level.
机构:
Univ New S Wales, Australian Sch Business, Sch Econ, Sydney, NSW 2052, AustraliaUniv New S Wales, Australian Sch Business, Sch Econ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Ghosh, Arghya
Robertson, Peter E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Western Australia M251, Crawley, WA 6009, AustraliaUniv New S Wales, Australian Sch Business, Sch Econ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia