Impacts of carbon emissions allowance limitations on carbon price with power generation rights trading in China

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Shuqin [1 ]
Xu, Qi [1 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Stricter carbon emissions allowance constraints; Carbon reduction; Renewable power consumption; Optimal pricing; Generation rights trading; RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARDS; GREEN CERTIFICATE; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY; SYSTEM; EXPERIENCES; CURTAILMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143312
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon pricing is a crucial mechanism for achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality through the carbon trading market. Recently, the price of carbon emissions allowances in China's national carbon market has shown a gradual upward trend. The limitations on carbon emissions allowances have also become increasingly stringent. Power generators, which primarily rely on thermal power generation, have a substantial demand for carbon emissions allowances. The rising prices and stricter carbon emissions constraints have increased operational costs. Therefore, exploring the carbon pricing mechanism under more stringent carbon emissions allowance constraints is vital. It encourages thermal power generators to engage in carbon trading and reduce carbon emissions. This paper focuses on an energy trading platform supply chain comprising three power generators, one energy trading platform, and one power retailer. We consider stringent carbon emissions constraints and power generation rights trading. Through the analysis of three scenarios, the study explores optimal pricing decisions for carbon emissions allowances to facilitate carbon emission reduction and promote renewable energy generation and consumption. The findings indicate that, under certain conditions (i.e., the carbon quotas allocation coefficient b 1 is an element of [0.73, 0.8]), ]), scenario 3, which excludes generation rights trading, yields the highest optimal carbon price. The energy trading platform can adjust various commissions to influence the carbon price, as well as the price and quantity of generation rights trading. Introducing power generation rights trading proves beneficial in reducing carbon emissions (nearly 400 tons less than that in scenario 3 without generation rights trading, when the realized total power demand is around 8600 MWh) and fostering renewable power generation and consumption (the actual renewable power consumption weight is 3% higher than that without generation rights trading). When considering generation rights trading, the high-emission generator and renewable power generator achieve the highest power profits, while for the low-emission generator, the profit in this case is the second best among these scenarios. Moreover, by decreasing the coefficient of carbon quotas allocation and increasing the reduction rate simultaneously, the carbon cost will pass through to the electricity price more sufficiently (e.g., when b 1 = 0.76, the pass-through rate increases from 0.5015 to 0.7984), particularly within a specific range of the carbon quotas allocation coefficient.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Spillover Effect between Carbon Emission Trading (CET) Price and Power Company Stock Price in China
    Li, Yanbin
    Nie, Dan
    Li, Bingkang
    Li, Xiyu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [42] Carbon taxes and carbon emissions trading
    Ekins, P
    Barker, T
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2001, 15 (03) : 325 - 376
  • [43] Price drivers in the carbon emissions trading scheme: Evidence from Chinese emissions trading scheme pilots
    Ji, Chang-Jing
    Hu, Yu-Jie
    Tang, Bao-Jun
    Qu, Shen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
  • [44] An Integrated Approach to Simulate the Impacts of Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes
    Labandeira, Xavier
    Linares, Pedro
    Rodriguez, Miguel
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 217 - 237
  • [45] Optimal carbon allowance price in China's carbon emission trading system: Perspective from the multi-sectoral marginal abatement cost
    Tang, Bao-Jun
    Ji, Chang-Jing
    Hu, Yu-Jie
    Tan, Jin-Xiao
    Wang, Xiang-Yu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 253
  • [46] Trading our way to a greener future: how environmental rights trading reduces urban carbon emissions in China—empirical analysis based on China’s emission rights trading
    Xu Wang
    Xiang Su
    Yu Feng
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 15671 - 15688
  • [47] Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China
    Deng, Zhe
    Li, Dongya
    Pang, Tao
    Duan, Maosheng
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2018, 18 (08) : 992 - 1011
  • [48] The effectiveness and heterogeneity of carbon emissions trading scheme in China
    Tang, Kai
    Zhou, Ye
    Liang, Xiaoyu
    Zhou, Di
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (14) : 17306 - 17318
  • [49] China's carbon emissions trading and stock returns
    Wen, Fenghua
    Wu, Nan
    Gong, Xu
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86
  • [50] The effectiveness and heterogeneity of carbon emissions trading scheme in China
    Kai Tang
    Ye Zhou
    Xiaoyu Liang
    Di Zhou
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 17306 - 17318