Efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: A systematic meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Zihan [1 ]
Wu, Yarui [1 ]
Geng, Xuhua [1 ]
Yuan, Congrui [1 ]
Fu, Yi [1 ]
Yang, Guibin [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Aerosp Ctr Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
Clostridium difficile infection; fidaxomicin; meta-analysis; vancomycin; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CARRIAGE; DIARRHEA;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039213
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the efficacy, recurrence rate, adverse event rate and mortality of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin in treating different types of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinical trial registration databases for research on fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the treatment of CDI and the retrieval period extended from the establishment of the database to July 22, 2022. A total of 15 studies were included, including 8 RCTs and 7 retrospective cohort studies. Results: Results showed that there was no significant difference in the overall efficacy of the treatment between fidaxomicin and vancomycin, and results in the subgroups of CDI hypervirulent strains and recurrent CDI were obtained, but vancomycin was more effective than fidaxomicin in the treatment of severe CDI (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98, P < .01). Results showed that fidaxomicin is superior to vancomycin in terms of 40-day recurrence rate (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.70, P < .01), 60-day recurrence rate (RR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21-0.69, P < .01) and 90-day recurrence rate (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50-0.77, P < .01). For the recurrence rate of the treatment in CDI hypervirulent strains, severe CDI and recurrent CDI, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical adverse reactions, and same outcomes appeared in all-cause mortality at 40-day, severe CDI and recurrent CDI, but fidaxomicin was superior to vancomycin in all-cause mortality over 60-day (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34-0.96, P = .03). Conclusion: There were no significant differences between fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the treatment of CDI in therapeutic effectiveness and adverse reactions, while fidaxomicin was superior to vancomycin in terms of recurrence rate and long-term mortality, and vancomycin is more effective in treating severe CDI.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    El Kurdi, Bara
    El Iskandarani, Mahmoud
    Babar, Sumbal
    Haddad, Ibrahim
    Alomari, Mohammad
    Al Momani, Laith
    Young, Mark
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S126 - S126
  • [42] Fidaxomicin for Clostridium difficile Infection
    Louie, Thomas J.
    Gorbach, Sherwood
    Sears, Pamela
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (19): : 1875 - 1876
  • [43] Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection
    Quraishi, M. N.
    Widlak, M.
    Bhala, N.
    Moore, D.
    Price, M.
    Sharma, N.
    Iqbal, T. H.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 46 (05) : 479 - 493
  • [44] Efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis for prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tariq, Raseen
    Laguio-Vila, Maryrose
    Tahir, Muhammad Waqas
    Orenstein, Robert
    Pardi, Darrell S.
    Khanna, Sahil
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 14
  • [45] EFFICACY OF ORAL VANCOMYCIN PROPHYLAXIS FOR PREVENTION OF CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Tariq, Raseen
    LaguioVila, Maryrose
    Kamal, Faisal
    Hayat, Maham
    Orenstein, Robert
    Pardi, Darrell S.
    Khanna, Sahil
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S897 - S898
  • [46] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Efficacy of Vancomycin Taper and Pulse Regimens in Clostridioides difficile Infection
    Sehgal, Kanika
    Zandvakili, Inuk
    Tariq, Raseen
    Pardi, Darrell S.
    Khanna, Sahil
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2022, 20 (04) : 577 - 583
  • [47] Fidaxomicin: a new option for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection
    Johnson, Alan P.
    Wilcox, Mark H.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 67 (12) : 2788 - 2792
  • [48] Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: EXTEND study subgroup analyses
    Cornely, Oliver A.
    Vehreschild, Maria J. G. T.
    Adomakoh, Nicholas
    Georgopali, Areti
    Karas, Andreas
    Kazeem, Gbenga
    Guery, Benoit
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 38 (06) : 1187 - 1194
  • [49] Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: EXTEND study subgroup analyses
    Oliver A. Cornely
    Maria J. G. T. Vehreschild
    Nicholas Adomakoh
    Areti Georgopali
    Andreas Karas
    Gbenga Kazeem
    Benoit Guery
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2019, 38 : 1187 - 1194
  • [50] Fidaxomicin: A Macrocyclic Antibiotic for the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection
    Hardesty, Jennifer S.
    Juang, Paul
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 31 (09): : 877 - 886