Experimental Comparison of Two 6D Pose Estimation Algorithms in Robotic Fruit-Picking Tasks

被引:0
|
作者
Alterani, Alessio Benito [1 ]
Costanzo, Marco [1 ]
De Simone, Marco [1 ]
Federico, Sara [1 ]
Natale, Ciro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dipartimento Ingn, Via Roma 29, I-81031 Aversa, CE, Italy
关键词
pose estimation; robotic grasping; deep learning;
D O I
10.3390/robotics13090127
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper presents an experimental comparison between two existing methods representative of two categories of 6D pose estimation algorithms nowadays commonly used in the robotics community. The first category includes purely deep learning methods, while the second one includes hybrid approaches combining learning pipelines and geometric reasoning. The hybrid method considered in this paper is a pipeline of an instance-level deep neural network based on RGB data only and a geometric pose refinement algorithm based on the availability of the depth map and the CAD model of the target object. Such a method can handle objects whose dimensions differ from those of the CAD. The pure learning method considered in this comparison is DenseFusion, a consolidated state-of-the-art pose estimation algorithm selected because it uses the same input data, namely, RGB image and depth map. The comparison is carried out by testing the success rate of fresh food pick-and-place operations. The fruit-picking scenario has been selected for the comparison because it is challenging due to the high variability of object instances in appearance and dimensions. The experiments carried out with apples and limes show that the hybrid method outperforms the pure learning one in terms of accuracy, thus allowing the pick-and-place operation of fruits with a higher success rate. An extensive discussion is also presented to help the robotics community select the category of 6D pose estimation algorithms most suitable to the specific application.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SilhoNet: An RGB Method for 6D Object Pose Estimation
    Billings, Gideon
    Johnson-Roberson, Matthew
    IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2019, 4 (04): : 3727 - 3734
  • [42] Impact of Segmentation and Color Spaces in 6D Pose Estimation
    Pereira, Nuno
    Alexandre, Luis A.
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS ROBOT SYSTEMS AND COMPETITIONS (ICARSC), 2021, : 228 - 233
  • [43] MagicCubePose, A more comprehensive 6D pose estimation network
    Fudong Li
    Dongyang Gao
    Qiang Huang
    Wei Li
    Yuequan Yang
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [44] On Object Symmetries and 6D Pose Estimation from Images
    Pitteri, Giorgia
    Ramamonjisoa, Michael
    Ilic, Slobodan
    Lepetit, Vincent
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D VISION (3DV 2019), 2019, : 614 - 622
  • [45] DeepIM: Deep Iterative Matching for 6D Pose Estimation
    Yi Li
    Gu Wang
    Xiangyang Ji
    Yu Xiang
    Dieter Fox
    International Journal of Computer Vision, 2020, 128 : 657 - 678
  • [46] EdgePose: An Edge Attention Network for 6D Pose Estimation
    Feng, Qi
    Nong, Jian
    Liang, Yanyan
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (17)
  • [47] AttentionVote: A coarse-to-fine voting network of anchor-free 6D pose estimation on point cloud for robotic bin-picking application
    Zhuang, Chungang
    Wang, Haoyu
    Ding, Han
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2024, 86
  • [48] 6D Pose Estimation for Subsea Intervention in Turbid Waters
    Mohammed, Ahmed
    Kvam, Johannes
    Thielemann, Jens T.
    Haugholt, Karl H.
    Risholm, Petter
    ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (19)
  • [49] Confidence-Based 6D Object Pose Estimation
    Huang, Wei-Lun
    Hung, Chun-Yi
    Lin, I-Chen
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2022, 24 : 3025 - 3035
  • [50] Focal segmentation for robust 6D object pose estimation
    Ye, Yuning
    Park, Hanhoon
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (16) : 47563 - 47585