A Spatial Reconstruction Method of Ionospheric foF2 Based on High Accuracy Surface Modeling Theory

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Han, Han [1 ]
Shi, Yafei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Microelect, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Qingdao Inst Ocean Technol, Qingdao 266200, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Organ Integrated Circuit, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
HAS; foF2; ionosphere; spatial reconstruction; HASM; INTERPOLATION;
D O I
10.3390/rs16173247
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ionospheric F2 critical frequency (foF2) is one of the most crucial application parameters in high-frequency communication, detection, and electronic warfare. To improve the accuracy of spatial reconstruction of the ionospheric foF2, we propose a high-accuracy surface (HAS) modeling method. This method converts difficult-to-solve differential equations into more manageable algebraic equations using direct difference approximation, significantly reducing algorithm complexity and computational load while exhibiting excellent convergence properties. We used seven stations in Brisbane, Canberra, Darwin, Hobart, Learmonth, Perth, and Townsville, with one station as a validation station and six as training stations (e.g., Brisbane as a validation station and the other stations-Canberra, Darwin, Hobart, Learmonth, Perth, and Townsville-as training stations). The training stations and the HAS method were used to train and reconstruct the validation stations at different solar activity periods, seasons, and local times. The predicted values of the validation stations were compared with the measured values, and the proposed method was analyzed and validated. The reconstruction results show the following. (1) The relative root mean square errors (RRMSEs) of HAS method prediction in different solar activity epochs were 13.67%, 7.74%, and 9.19%, respectively, which are 13.57%, 7.41%, and 6.41% higher than the prediction accuracy of the Kriging method, respectively. (2) In the four seasons, the RRMSEs of the HAS method prediction are 9.27%, 13.1%, 8.81%, and 8.09%, respectively, which are 10.83%, 11.73%, 4.25%, and 12.00% higher than the prediction accuracy of the Kriging method. (c) During the daytime and nighttime, the RRMSEs of HAS method prediction were 9.23% and 11.17%, which were 5.92% and 11.99% higher than the prediction accuracy of the Kriging method, respectively. (d) Under the validation dataset, the average predictive RRMSE of the HAS method was 10.29%, and the average predictive RRMSE of the IRI prediction model was 12.35%, with a 2.06% improvement in the predictive accuracy of the HAS method. In general, the prediction effect of the HAS method was better than that of the Kriging method, thus verifying the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method. In summary, the proposed reconstruction method is of great significance for improving usable frequency prediction and enhancing communication performance.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Informer Architecture-Based Ionospheric foF2 Model in the Middle Latitude Region
    Bi, Cheng
    Ren, Peng
    Yin, Ting
    Zhang, Yang
    Li, Bai
    Xiang, Zheng
    IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2022, 19
  • [22] A Forecasting Model of Ionospheric foF2 Using the LSTM Network Based on ICEEMDAN Decomposition
    Shi, Yafei
    Yang, Cheng
    Wang, Jian
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Meng, Fanyi
    Bai, Hongmei
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61 : 1 - 16
  • [23] Assessment of Current Capabilities in Modeling the Ionospheric Climatology for Space Weather Applications: foF2 and hmF2
    Tsagouri, Ioanna
    Goncharenko, Larisa
    Shim, Ja Soon
    Belehaki, Anna
    Buresova, Dalia
    Kuznetsova, Maria M.
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 16 (12): : 1930 - 1945
  • [24] Empirical modeling of global ionospheric foF2 response to geomagnetic activity -: art. no. 1021
    Kutiev, I
    Muhtarov, P
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A1)
  • [25] Modeling and Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Variation Based on CNN-BiLSTM-TPA during Low- and High-Solar Activity Years
    Xu, Baoyi
    Huang, Wenqiang
    Ren, Peng
    Li, Yi
    Xiang, Zheng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [26] Modeling ionospheric foF2 response during geomagnetic storms using neural network and linear regression techniques
    Tshisaphungo, Mpho
    Habarulema, John Bosco
    McKinnell, Lee-Anne
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2018, 61 (12) : 2891 - 2903
  • [27] Ionospheric high frequency wave propagation using different IRI hmF2 and foF2 models
    Fagre, Mariano
    Zossi, Bruno S.
    Chum, Jaroslav
    Yigit, Erdal
    Elias, Ana G.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2019, 196
  • [28] Dependence of foF2 on Solar Activity Indices Based on the Data of Ionospheric Stations of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres
    Danilov, A. D.
    Berbeneva, N. A.
    GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2024, 64 (02) : 224 - 234
  • [29] A Forecast Model of Ionospheric foF2 for HF Radio Wave Propagation Based on Echo State Network
    Shi, Yafei
    Yang, Cheng
    Wang, Jian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2025, 73 (02) : 1275 - 1280
  • [30] The cross correlation method response prior to earthquakes using foF2 data from various ionospheric stations
    Benghanem, K.
    Kahlouche, S.
    Abtout, A.
    Beldjoudi, H.
    Advances in Space Research, 2020, 63 (08) : 2638 - 2658