Ecohydrological risk assessment model for the Pra River Basin using GIS and multi-criteria decision making

被引:0
|
作者
Ashiagbor, George [1 ]
Sackey, Magdalene [1 ]
Gyampoh, Benjamin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Renewable Nat Resources, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
Watershed management; river basin degradation; IWRM; ecohydrology; POPULATION-DENSITY; WATER-QUALITY; LAND-USE; SOIL; MANAGEMENT; GHANA; AHP;
D O I
10.1080/15715124.2024.2411237
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The Pra River Basin in Ghana is a major source of ecological, cultural, and economic benefits. However, it has been experiencing degradation, and logistical constraints have limited the implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management. This study presents a GIS-based ecohydrological risk model that identifies ecohydrological units with the highest degradation risk. First, the PRB was divided into 25 eco-hydrological units. Second, seven drivers of degradation were identified and mapped. The drivers were reclassified into five categories with risk scores of 1-5, with 5 indicating higher risk scores. The variables were ranked using the Analytical Hierarchy Process, the degradation risk model was calculated using the weighted sum method, and the multi-criteria decision tool was used to identify the ecohydrological units with the highest degradation risk. Of the 25 ecohydrological units delineated, the Buama, Lower Offin, Ayensu, and Oda ecohydrological units were found to be at the highest risk of degradation due to high artisanal small-scale gold mining, high population density, low forest/vegetation cover, and high encroachment in waterways. The results can be used as a guide to prioritize management intervention, starting with the areas classified as high risk and moving down to those classified as moderate risk.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Erosion Risk Prediction Using Multi-Criteria Assessment in Ankara Guvenc Basin
    Turan, Inci Demirag
    Dengiz, Orhan
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES-TARIM BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2017, 23 (03): : 285 - 297
  • [42] Group Decision-Making Using Improved Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Credit Risk Analysis
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    FILOMAT, 2016, 30 (15) : 4135 - 4150
  • [43] Multi-criteria decision making in ontologies
    Bastinos, Ana Sasa
    Krisper, Marjan
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 222 : 593 - 610
  • [44] Pareto multi-criteria decision making
    Grierson, Donald E.
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (03) : 371 - 384
  • [45] Fundamentals of multi-criteria decision making
    不详
    EFFICIENCY VERSUS SUSTAINABILITY IN DYNAMIC DECISION MAKING, 2002, 520 : 21 - 73
  • [46] Categorization in multi-criteria decision making
    Yager, Ronald R.
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 460 : 416 - 423
  • [47] An integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainability Performance Assessment for Insurance Companies
    Beiragh, Ramin Gharizadeh
    Alizadeh, Reza
    Kaleibari, Saeid Shafiei
    Cavallaro, Fausto
    Zolfani, Sarfaraz Hashemkhani
    Bausys, Romualdas
    Mardani, Abbas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [48] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [49] Multi-criteria decision-making model for assessment of large photovoltaic farms in Brazil
    Rediske, Graciele
    Siluk, Julio Cezar M.
    Michels, Leandro
    Rigo, Paula D.
    Rosa, Carmen B.
    Cugler, Gilberto
    ENERGY, 2020, 197 (197)
  • [50] A Markov Model for Multi-Criteria Multi-Person Decision Making
    Chelvier, Rene
    Dammasch, Kristina
    Horton, Graham
    Knoll, Stefan-Werner
    Krull, Claudia
    Rauch-Gebbensleben, Benjamin
    IIT: 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, : 218 - 222