Flow Cytometry Method Validation Protocols

被引:8
|
作者
Selliah, Nithianandan [1 ]
Nash, Veronica [1 ]
Eck, Steven [2 ]
Green, Cherie [3 ]
Oldaker, Teri
Stewart, Jennifer [4 ]
Vitaliti, Alessandra [5 ]
Litwin, Virginia [6 ]
机构
[1] Cerba Res, Lake Success, NY USA
[2] AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[3] Ozette Technol, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Flow Contract Site Lab LLC, Bothell, WA USA
[5] Novartis Pharm AG, Novartis Inst Biomed Res, Basel, Switzerland
[6] Eurofins Biopharm Serv, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
CURRENT PROTOCOLS | 2023年 / 3卷 / 08期
关键词
biomarker; fit-for-purpose validation; flow cytometry; precision; sensitivity; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1002/cpz1.868
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Analytical method validation provides a means to ensure that data are credible and reproducible. This article will provide a brief introduction to analytical method validation as applied to cellular analysis by flow cytometry, along with practical procedures for four different types of validation. The first, Basic Protocol 1 (the limited validation protocol), is recommended for research and non-regulated laboratories. Next, Basic Protocol 2) presents a reasonable, fit-for-purpose validation approach appropriate for biopharma and research settings. Basic Protocol 3 addresses the type of validation performed in clinical laboratories for moderate-risk tests developed in house. Finally, Basic Protocol 4 describes the process that should be applied whenever a method is being transferred from one facility to another. All four validation plans follow the fit-for-purpose validation approach, in which the validation parameters are selected based on the intended use of the assay. These validation protocols represent the minimal requirement and may not be applicable for every intended use such as high-risk clinical assays or data to be used as a primary endpoint in a clinical trial. The recommendations presented here are consistent with the white papers published by the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists and the International Clinical Cytometry Society, as well as with Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute Guideline H62: Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry (CLSI, 2021). (c) 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1: Limited validationBasic Protocol 2: Fit-for-purpose validation for biopharma and research settingsBasic Protocol 3: Validation for moderate clinical risk laboratory developed testsBasic Protocol 4: Transfer validation
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Other protocols for the study of type B lymphocyte subpopulations, using flow cytometry
    Munoz, A.
    Martinez, R.
    Rodriguez, S.
    Leon, M.
    Gallo, F.
    Paz, J. A.
    Cid, N.
    Velloso, M. L.
    Hernandez, R.
    Uceda, J.
    Gonzalez, P.
    Mayordomo, L.
    Rejon, E.
    Marenco, J. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2013, 43 : 81 - 82
  • [32] Development and validation of flow cytometry methods for pharmacodynamic clinical biomarkers
    Wu, Dianna Y.
    Patti-Diaz, Lisa
    Hill, Carla G.
    BIOANALYSIS, 2010, 2 (09) : 1617 - 1626
  • [33] High-throughput flow cytometry: Validation in microvolume bioassays
    Ramirez, S
    Aiken, CT
    Andrzejewski, B
    Sklar, LA
    Edwards, BS
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2003, 53A (01) : 55 - 65
  • [34] Development and validation of a flow cytometry antibody test for Lawsonia intracellularis
    Baldasso, Debora Zini
    Guizzo, Joao Antonio
    Dazzi, Claudia Cerutti
    Frandoloso, Gabriela Carolina Paraboni
    Feronato, Cesar
    von Berg, Stephan
    Guedes, Roberto Mauricio Carvalho
    Wilson, Heather Lynne
    Kreutz, Luiz Carlos
    Frandoloso, Rafael
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [35] Optimization of protocols for Iberian Red Deer sperm sex sorting by flow cytometry
    Parrilla, I.
    Del Olmo, D.
    Bisbal, A.
    Ortiz, J. A.
    Maroto, A.
    Garcia-Alvarez, O.
    Roca, J.
    Martinez, E. A.
    Garde, J. J.
    Vazquez, J. M.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2012, 47 : 102 - 103
  • [36] Flow Cytometry Protocols for Surface and Intracellular Antigen Analyses of Neural Cell Types
    Menon, Vishal
    Thomas, Ria
    Ghale, Arun R.
    Reinhard, Christina
    Pruszak, Jan
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2014, (94):
  • [37] Comparison of two gating protocols for the analysis of natural killer cells by flow cytometry
    Ding, T
    Soucy, N
    Bergeron, M
    Mandy, F
    CYTOMETRY, 2002, : 103 - 103
  • [38] Myelodysplastic syndrome: validation of flow cytometry multilineage score system
    de Araujo, Helena Varela
    Correia, Rodolfo Patussi
    Bento, Laiz Cameirao
    Vaz, Andressa da Costa
    de Sousa, Flavia Arandas
    Alexandre, Anderson Marega
    Schimidell, Daniela
    Pedro, Eduardo de Carvalho
    Ioshida, Marcia Regina
    Barroso, Rodrigo de Souza
    Bacal, Nydia Strachman
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2020, 18 : eAO4966
  • [39] Validation of CD 133 cell counting by flow-cytometry.
    Rehfeld, I. S.
    Kreissig, C.
    Eichler, H.
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2006, 8
  • [40] MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME: VALIDATION OF FLOW CYTOMETRY MULTILINEAGE SCORE SYSTEM
    Araujo, Helena
    Correia, Rodolfo
    Bento, Laiz
    Ioshida, Marcia
    Barroso, Rodrigo
    Bacal, Nydia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2018, 40 : 10 - 10