Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccines:Systematic Literature Reviewof Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Yiting [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Shuaixin [3 ]
Zhao, Yuyan [1 ]
Wang, Haode [4 ]
Jiang, Hongbo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 283 Jianghai Rd, Guangzhou 510310, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Basic Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Outpatient Dept Baogang, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, England
[5] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
来源
关键词
systematic review; discrete choice experiment; preference; COVID-19; vaccine; VACCINATION; VACCINES; PROGRAMS; DELIVERY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/56546
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccination can be viewed as comprising the most important defensive barriers to protect susceptible groupsfrom infection. However, vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 is widespread worldwide.Objective: We aimed to systematically review studies eliciting the COVID-19 vaccine preference using discrete choiceexperiments.Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus platforms inApril 2023. Search terms included discrete choice experiments, COVID-19, and vaccinesand related synonyms. Descriptivestatistics were used to summarize the study characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed by factors such as high-incomecountries and low- and middle-income countries and study period (before, during, and after the pandemic wave). Quality appraisalwas performed using the 5-item Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, and Significance checklist.Results: The search yield a total of 623 records, and 47 studies with 53 data points were finally included. Attributes weregrouped into 4 categories: outcome, process, cost, and others. The vaccine effectiveness (21/53, 40%) and safety (7/53, 13%)were the most frequently reported and important attributes. Subgroup analyses showed that vaccine effectiveness was the mostimportant attribute, although the preference varied by subgroups. Compared to high-income countries (3/29, 10%), a higherproportion of low- and middle-income countries (4/24, 17%) prioritized safety. As the pandemic progressed, the duration ofprotection (2/24, 8%) during the pandemic wave and COVID-19 mortality risk (5/25, 20%) after the pandemic wave emerged as2 of the most important attributes.Conclusions: Our review revealed the critical role of vaccine effectiveness and safety in COVID-19 vaccine preference. However,it should be noticed that preference heterogeneity was observed across subpopulations and may change over time
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Malaysian public preferences and decision making for COVID-19 vaccination: A discrete choice experiment
    Teh, Hoon Shien
    Woon, Yuan Liang
    Leong, Chin Tho
    Hing, Nicholas Yee Liang
    Mien, Teresa Yong Sui
    Roope, Laurence S. J.
    Clarke, Philip M.
    Lim, Lee -Ling
    Buckell, John
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2022, 27
  • [22] Incorporating respondent-driven sampling into web-based discrete choice experiments: preferences for COVID-19 mitigation measures
    Johnson, Courtney A.
    Tran, Dan N.
    Mwangi, Ann
    Sosa-Rubi, Sandra G.
    Chivardi, Carlos
    Romero-Martinez, Martin
    Pastakia, Sonak
    Robinson, Elisha
    Mayo-Wilson, Larissa Jennings
    Galarraga, Omar
    HEALTH SERVICES AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (03) : 297 - 316
  • [23] Incorporating respondent-driven sampling into web-based discrete choice experiments: preferences for COVID-19 mitigation measures
    Courtney A. Johnson
    Dan N. Tran
    Ann Mwangi
    Sandra G. Sosa-Rubí
    Carlos Chivardi
    Martín Romero-Martínez
    Sonak Pastakia
    Elisha Robinson
    Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson
    Omar Galárraga
    Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2022, 22 : 297 - 316
  • [24] Risk as an Attribute in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Harrison, Mark
    Rigby, Dan
    Vass, Caroline
    Flynn, Terry
    Louviere, Jordan
    Payne, Katherine
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02): : 151 - 170
  • [25] Risk as an Attribute in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Mark Harrison
    Dan Rigby
    Caroline Vass
    Terry Flynn
    Jordan Louviere
    Katherine Payne
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014, 7 : 151 - 170
  • [26] Investigating preferences of the covid-19 vaccine among individuals in Iran: Discrete choice experiment analysis
    Parvizi, Sanaz
    Mehrara, Mohsen
    Taiebnia, Ali
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (06)
  • [27] Students' preferences for returning to colleges and universities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A discrete choice experiment
    Steimle, Lauren N.
    Sun, Yuming
    Johnson, Lauren
    Besedes, Tibor
    Mokhtarian, Patricia
    Nazzal, Dima
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2022, 82
  • [28] Public Preferences for Policies to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake: A Discrete Choice Experiment in The Netherlands
    Mouter, Niek
    Boxebeld, Sander
    Kessels, Roselinde
    van Wijhe, Maarten
    de Wit, Ardine
    Lambooij, Mattijs
    van Exel, Job
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (08) : 1290 - 1297
  • [29] The Public's Preferences for Psychological Interventions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Li, Hui-qin
    Liu, Shu-xiang
    Xue, Hui
    Yuan, Hua
    Zhang, Xiu-ying
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [30] The COVID-19 vaccination decision-making preferences of elderly people: a discrete choice experiment
    Chen, Yuhan
    Wang, Jimeng
    Yi, Meixi
    Xu, Hongteng
    Liang, Hailun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)