Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccines:Systematic Literature Reviewof Discrete Choice Experiments

被引:2
|
作者
Huang, Yiting [1 ,2 ]
Feng, Shuaixin [3 ]
Zhao, Yuyan [1 ]
Wang, Haode [4 ]
Jiang, Hongbo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 283 Jianghai Rd, Guangzhou 510310, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Basic Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Med Stat, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Pharmaceut Univ, Outpatient Dept Baogang, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, England
[5] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
来源
关键词
systematic review; discrete choice experiment; preference; COVID-19; vaccine; VACCINATION; VACCINES; PROGRAMS; DELIVERY; DESIGN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/56546
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Vaccination can be viewed as comprising the most important defensive barriers to protect susceptible groupsfrom infection. However, vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 is widespread worldwide.Objective: We aimed to systematically review studies eliciting the COVID-19 vaccine preference using discrete choiceexperiments.Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus platforms inApril 2023. Search terms included discrete choice experiments, COVID-19, and vaccinesand related synonyms. Descriptivestatistics were used to summarize the study characteristics. Subgroup analyses were performed by factors such as high-incomecountries and low- and middle-income countries and study period (before, during, and after the pandemic wave). Quality appraisalwas performed using the 5-item Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, and Significance checklist.Results: The search yield a total of 623 records, and 47 studies with 53 data points were finally included. Attributes weregrouped into 4 categories: outcome, process, cost, and others. The vaccine effectiveness (21/53, 40%) and safety (7/53, 13%)were the most frequently reported and important attributes. Subgroup analyses showed that vaccine effectiveness was the mostimportant attribute, although the preference varied by subgroups. Compared to high-income countries (3/29, 10%), a higherproportion of low- and middle-income countries (4/24, 17%) prioritized safety. As the pandemic progressed, the duration ofprotection (2/24, 8%) during the pandemic wave and COVID-19 mortality risk (5/25, 20%) after the pandemic wave emerged as2 of the most important attributes.Conclusions: Our review revealed the critical role of vaccine effectiveness and safety in COVID-19 vaccine preference. However,it should be noticed that preference heterogeneity was observed across subpopulations and may change over time
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preferences For COVID-19 Vaccines Among University Students: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Tozduman, Busra
    Zengi, Irem
    Sozmen, Melih Kaan
    KLIMIK JOURNAL, 2024, 37 (02) : 97 - 103
  • [2] Efficacy or delivery? An online Discrete Choice Experiment to explore preferences for COVID-19 vaccines in the UK
    McPhedran, Robert
    Toombs, Ben
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 200
  • [3] COVID-19 VACCINATION PREFERENCES IN CHINA: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Wang, Jing
    Hu, Xinwen
    Wagner, Abram
    Lu, Yihan
    Jaime, Etienne
    Wu, Shiqiang
    Chen, Ying
    Ruan, Yuhua
    Pan, Stephen
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2021, 55 : S125 - S125
  • [4] Public preference for COVID-19 vaccines in China: A discrete choice experiment
    Dong, Dong
    Xu, Richard Huan
    Wong, Eliza Lai-yi
    Hung, Chi-Tim
    Feng, Da
    Feng, Zhanchun
    Yeoh, Eng-kiong
    Wong, Samuel Yeung-shan
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (06) : 1543 - 1578
  • [5] Student COVID-19 vaccination preferences in China: A discrete choice experiment
    Wang, Siyuan
    Maitland, Elizabeth
    Wang, Tiantian
    Nicholas, Stephen
    Leng, Anli
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [6] Patients’ preferences for primary health care – a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments
    Kim-Sarah Kleij
    Ulla Tangermann
    Volker E. Amelung
    Christian Krauth
    BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [7] Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments
    Kleij, Kim-Sarah
    Tangermann, Ulla
    Amelung, Volker E.
    Krauth, Christian
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [8] Discrete choice experiments in the analysis of consumers' preferences for finfish products: A systematic literature review
    Cantillo, Javier
    Carlos Martin, Juan
    Roman, Concepcion
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2020, 84
  • [9] Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: A systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments
    Sharma, Monisha
    Ong, Jason J.
    Celum, Connie
    Terris-Prestholt, Fern
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2020, 29-30
  • [10] Stated choice analysis of preferences for COVID-19 vaccines using the Choquet integral
    Krueger, Rico
    Daziano, Ricardo A.
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2022, 45