Optimum delineation of skin structure for dose calculation with the linear Boltzmann transport equation algorithm in radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:0
|
作者
Hamada, Keisuke [1 ,2 ]
Fujibuchi, Toshioh [3 ]
Arakawa, Hiroyuki [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org Kagoshima Med Ctr, Dept Radiol Technol, 8-1 Shiroyama Cho, Kagoshima 8920853, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Hlth Sci, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
Skin-surface dose; Skin-ring structure; Volumetric modulated arc therapy; Acuros XB; Head and neck; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; FILM DOSIMETRY; HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY; RADIOCHROMIC FILM; NECK CANCERS; ARC THERAPY; HEAD; SURFACE; PRECISION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-024-00840-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effectiveness of placing skin-ring structures to enhance the precision of skin dose calculations in patients who had undergone head and neck volumetric modulated arc therapy using the Acuros XB algorithm. The skin-ring structures in question were positioned 2 mm below the skin surface (skin A) and 1 mm above and below the skin surface (skin B) within the treatment-planning system. These structures were then tested on both acrylic cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms and compared with the Gafchromic EBT3 film (EBT3). The results revealed that the maximum dose differences between skins A and B for the cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms were approximately 12% and 2%, respectively. In patients 1 and 2, the dose differences between skins A and B were 9.2% and 8.2%, respectively. Ultimately, demonstrated that the skin-dose calculation accuracy of skin B was within 2% and did not impact the deep organs.
引用
收藏
页码:938 / 946
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical evaluation of a dose calculation algorithm based on the linear Boltzmann transport equation
    Stussi, A.
    Zamburlini, M.
    Andratschke, N.
    Lang, S.
    Klock, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S218 - S218
  • [2] Calculation of absorbed dose in radiotherapy by solution of the linear Boltzmann transport equations
    Bedford, James L.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (02):
  • [3] A Forward Scattering Approximation to Dose Calculation Using the Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation
    Catt, B.
    Snyder, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 567 - +
  • [4] Inverse radiotherapy treatment planning model applying Boltzmann-transport equation
    Tervo, J
    Kolmonen, P
    MATHEMATICAL MODELS & METHODS IN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2002, 12 (01): : 109 - 141
  • [5] The Effect of Various Dose Normalization Strategies When Implementing Linear Boltzmann Transport Equation Dose Calculation for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning
    Erickson, Brett G.
    Ackerson, Bradley G.
    Kelsey, Chris R.
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Adamson, Justus
    Cui, Yunfeng
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12 (05) : 446 - 456
  • [6] ESTABLISHING THE OPTIMUM DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHM AND SETTINGS FOR MONACO IMRT TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM
    Paynter, D.
    Bowden, J.
    Cosgrove, V.
    Thwaites, D. I.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S486 - S486
  • [7] Optimal treatment planning in radiotherapy based on Boltzmann transport calculations
    Frank, Martin
    Herty, Michael
    Schaefer, Matthias
    MATHEMATICAL MODELS & METHODS IN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2008, 18 (04): : 573 - 592
  • [8] A commercial treatment planning system with a hybrid dose calculation algorithm for synchrotron radiotherapy trials
    Day, L. R. J.
    Donzelli, M.
    Pellicioli, P.
    Smyth, L. M. L.
    Barnes, M.
    Bartzsch, S.
    Crosbie, J. C.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (05):
  • [9] CALCULATION OF ELECTRON DOSE DISTRIBUTION FOR RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING
    KAWACHI, K
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1975, 20 (04): : 571 - 577
  • [10] A Hybrid Superposition Monte Carlo (HSMC) dose calculation algorithm optimized for radiotherapy treatment planning
    Miften, M
    Kawrakow, I
    Alkaissi, A
    Kurup, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1731 - 1731