Who affects carbon emissions? Drivers and decoupling effects of agricultural carbon emissions-evidence from Sichuan, China

被引:1
|
作者
Meng, Yan [1 ]
Shen, Yangyang [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Yunqiang [1 ]
Wang, Fang [1 ]
Wang, Huan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
agricultural carbon emissions; logarithmic mean divisia index model; Tapio decoupling model; scenario analysis; carbon peak and carbon neutrality;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2024.1441118
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Mitigating agricultural carbon emissions is pivotal for attaining the objectives of carbon peak and carbon neutrality. Utilizing a time-varying parametric Cobb-Douglas (C-D) production function, this study employs an enhanced Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition approach, the Tapio decoupling model, and Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the determinants and decoupling dynamics of agricultural carbon emissions within Sichuan Province from 2010 to 2020. The findings reveal that: (1) Factors such as carbon emission intensity, agricultural structure, labor inputs, and capital stock played a significant role in suppressing agricultural carbon emissions, collectively contributing to a reduction of 484.12 million tonnes. (2) The unstable decoupling of agricultural carbon emissions from economic development in Sichuan Province. Capital stock, alongside carbon emission intensity and agricultural structure, significantly contributed to this decoupling. To harmonize agricultural economic growth with carbon emission reduction, emphasis should be placed on manure management and resource utilization in livestock and poultry farming. Furthermore, leveraging technological advancements to enhance resource efficiency is crucial for reducing carbon emissions. Simultaneously, strategic management of fixed asset growth, focused on energy conservation, can catalyze the synergistic effects of economic development and technological spillovers.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research on Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction Strategies in China
    Wang, Guofeng
    Liao, Maolin
    Jiang, Jie
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [22] Can Agricultural Productive Services Inhibit Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China
    Bai, Ziming
    Wang, Tianyi
    Xu, Jiabin
    Li, Cuixia
    LAND, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [23] The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China
    Li, Chen
    Chen, Guohua
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Li, Yajin
    Ding, Weichao
    Yu, Xiuxiu
    He, Bing
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2025, 34 (02): : 1593 - 1605
  • [24] Environmental regulations and agricultural carbon emissions efficiency: Evidence from rural China
    Xia, Yujie
    Guo, Hongpeng
    Xu, Shuang
    Pan, Chulin
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [25] Drivers and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions in the non-ferrous metal industry-evidence from 28 provinces in China
    Zeng, Guohua
    Zhong, Minglong
    Xiao, Chengzhang
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [26] Spatial and Temporal Characteristics and Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Jiangsu Province, China
    Hu, Chao
    Fan, Jin
    Chen, Jian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [27] Effects of Rural Population Aging on Agricultural Carbon Emissions in China
    Zhang, Yongqiang
    Dong, Quanyao
    Ma, Guifang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [28] Changes in crop mix and the effects on agricultural carbon emissions in China
    Meng, Fei
    Chen, Hang
    Tan, Yongzhong
    Xiong, Wenying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [29] Effects of population flow on regional carbon emissions: evidence from China
    Wu, Lei
    Jia, Xiaoyan
    Gao, Li
    Zhou, Yuanqi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (44) : 62628 - 62639
  • [30] Effects of population flow on regional carbon emissions: evidence from China
    Lei Wu
    Xiaoyan Jia
    Li Gao
    Yuanqi Zhou
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 62628 - 62639