A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, Chung-Tse [1 ]
Lin, Yu-Hsien [1 ]
Wu, Yun-Che [1 ]
Shih, Cheng-Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kun-Hui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pan, Chien-Chou [1 ,5 ]
Lee, Cheng-Hung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Hungkuang Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Coll Med, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
[4] Hungkuang Univ, Coll Intelligent Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[5] Jenteh Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Dept Rehabil Sci, Miaoli 35664, Taiwan
关键词
lumbar spine; adjacent segment disease (ASD); oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF); COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13195843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Various surgical approaches have been proposed for treating adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion. However, studies using oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) to treat ASD are lacking. The current study assessed the postoperative outcomes of single-level OLIF for ASD, comparing the results with those for patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: Patients who underwent single-level OLIF or TLIF for lumbar ASD were retrospectively included. Clinical outcomes, that is, the results of assessments using the Euroqol 5-Dimension quality of life scale (EQ-5D), the Oswestry Disability Index, and the visual analog scale, were evaluated. Radiologic parameters, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), segmental coronal angle (SCA), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, were also assessed. Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled: 32 in the OLIF group and 33 in the TLIF group. The median follow-up time was 24.0 months in both groups. The clinical outcomes and radiologic parameters significantly improved in both groups postoperatively. According to intergroup comparisons, the OLIF group had significantly less blood loss and superior improvement in radiologic parameters (DH, SL, and SCA) whereas the TLIF group had significantly shorter operation times. For the OLIF patients who did not undergo posterior decompression, the operation time was similar to that of the TLIF group, but the surgical blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced compared with the TLIF group. Conclusions: Compared with TLIF, OLIF provides similar clinical outcomes, leads to less surgical blood loss, and has superior radiologic parameters; however, the operation time is significantly longer. OLIF without posterior decompression may be a superior option to TLIF for certain patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparative Analysis of Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Wiltse Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approaches for Treating Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Nurmukhametov, Renat
    Dosanov, Medet
    Medetbek, Abakirov
    Ramirez, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion
    Chavda, Vishal
    Chmutin, Gennady
    Montemurro, Nicola
    SURGERIES, 2023, 4 (04): : 623 - 634
  • [12] Is Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Superior to Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis? A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Jiang, Xijia
    Xu, Nanwei
    Nong, Luming
    Jiang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 85 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [13] Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Patel, Ravi
    Makda, Junaid
    Hong, Joseph
    Anderson, David G.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Albert, Todd J.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08): : 623 - 629
  • [14] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [15] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266
  • [16] Comparison of Outcomes Between Single-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Tan, Marcus Wei Ping
    Sayampanathan, Andrew A.
    Jiang, Lei
    Guo, Chang Ming
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (10): : 395 - 405
  • [17] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Chen, Jiang-Wei
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1259 - 1266
  • [18] Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (04) : 447 - 454
  • [19] Effect of Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Disease
    Cheng, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhang, Kai
    Sun, Xiaojiang
    Zhao, Changqing
    Li, Hua
    Li, Yan Michael
    Zhao, Jie
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 109 : E244 - E251
  • [20] Comparison of Incidence of Adjacent Segment Pathology between Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Treatments for Lumbosacral Junction
    Wu, Po-Kuan
    Wu, Meng-Huang
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Huang, Tsung-Jen
    Lee, Ching-Yu
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 7 (04) : 855 - 865