Rational inattention in games: experimental evidence

被引:1
|
作者
Almog, David [1 ]
Martin, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
Rational inattention; Limited attention; Cognitive costs; Strategic pricing; Asymmetric information; C91; D82; D83; D90; D91; INFORMATION; COORDINATION; UNCERTAINTY; ULTIMATUMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10683-024-09843-z
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To investigate whether attention responds rationally to strategic incentives, we experimentally implement a buyer-seller game in which a fully informed seller makes a take-it-or-leave-it offer to a buyer who faces cognitive costs to process information about the offer's value. We isolate the impact of seller strategies on buyer attention by exogenously varying the seller's outside option, which leads sellers to price high more often. We find that buyers respond by making fewer mistakes conditional on value, which suggests that buyers exert higher attentional effort in response to the increased strategic incentives for paying attention. We show that a standard model of rational inattention based on Shannon mutual information cannot fully explain this change in buyer behavior. However, we identify another class of rational inattention models consistent with this behavioral pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 742
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
    Isamu Okada
    Hitoshi Yamamoto
    Yoshiki Sato
    Satoshi Uchida
    Tatsuya Sasaki
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [32] Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
    Okada, Isamu
    Yamamoto, Hitoshi
    Sato, Yoshiki
    Uchida, Satoshi
    Sasaki, Tatsuya
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [33] Travel time variability and rational inattention
    Fosgerau, Mogens
    Jiang, Gege
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2019, 120 : 1 - 14
  • [34] Strategic pricing with rational inattention to quality
    Martin, Daniel
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2017, 104 : 131 - 145
  • [35] Geometric methods for finite rational inattention
    Armenter, Roc
    Mueller-Itten, Michele
    Stangebye, Zachary R.
    QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2024, 15 (01) : 115 - 144
  • [36] RATIONAL INATTENTION, COMPETITIVE SUPPLY, AND PSYCHOMETRICS
    Caplin, Andrew
    Csaba, Daniel
    Leahy, John
    Nov, Oded
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 135 (03): : 1681 - 1724
  • [37] Dynamic rational inattention: Analytical results
    Mackowiak, Bartosz
    Matejka, Filip
    Wiederholt, Mirko
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2018, 176 : 650 - 692
  • [38] Rational Inattention in Controlled Markov Processes
    Shafieepoorfard, Ehsan
    Raginsky, Maxim
    Meyn, Sean P.
    2013 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2013, : 6790 - 6797
  • [39] Rational Inattention in Scalar LQG Control
    Shafieepoorfard, Ehsan
    Raginsky, Maxim
    2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 5733 - 5739
  • [40] Constrained versus Unconstrained Rational Inattention
    Azrieli, Yaron
    GAMES, 2021, 12 (01): : 1 - 22