Comparative evaluation of adverse drug reactions for tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate using the FAERS Database: a disproportionality analysis

BackgroundTenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are widely used nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), necessitating a thorough understanding of their safety profiles to ensure optimal patient care and treatment adherence.MethodsWe employed statistical methods including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) to compare and evaluate the safety profiles of these NRTIs.ResultsTAF was significantly associated with weight increase (ROR: 6.43; 95% CI: 5.93-6.96) and specific psychiatric disorders. TDF showed a notable signal for renal disorders and product-related issues, including product dose omission (ROR: 3.53; 95% CI: 3.22-3.87). Additionally, the study highlighted differences in safety signals related to pregnancy outcomes, with TAF having a higher ROR for maternal exposure (ROR: 7.83; 95% CI: 7.06-8.69) and TDF for fetal exposure (ROR: 4.51; 95% CI: 3.93-5.18), underscoring the need for cautious use in pregnant women. The comparative analysis also identified signals for osteonecrosis (ROR: 108.81; 95% CI: 106.25-111.43) and bone loss (ROR: 714; 95% CI: 685.49-743.68) for TAF and TDF, respectively, highlighting the importance of bone health considerations in treatment plans.ConclusionThese findings underscore the importance of personalized antiviral therapy and patient safety.