SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION FOR AGRONOMIC EXPERIMENTS

被引:0
|
作者
Elsahookie, Medhat M. [1 ]
Dawood, A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Baghdad, Coll Agr Eng Sci, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Minist Agr, Gen Board Agr Res, Baghdad, Iraq
来源
关键词
kernel weight; plant seed yield; sunflower; maize; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Determining sample size to estimate the mean value of a target (infinite) population is of prime importance to have correct results and conclusions. In general, sample sizes differ as the studied objects differ. Another factor affect sample size is number of replicates or groups. Small objects, such as seeds, grains, and bacterial cell sizes require in general larger sample sizes as compared to large objects, such as human patients, large animals, and large trees. In this short article, a mixture of 12 crosses, maize kernels (k) were mixed to have 12,000 kernels. Sample sizes of 50,100, 150, 200, 250, and 300k were taken to find out which sample size fits the mean of target population (12,000 k). Sample size of at least 100 k and up gave the best good fit as compared by Chi-square, P =0.10 and 0.05 atAone of degree of freedom. This result was on a heterogenous population of different maize crosses kernel sizes. On the other hand, a population of kernels of a maize cross (32x19), as homogenous population was studied by taking sample sizes of 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 1000 k. Depending on Chi-square test, sample sizes of 50 and 100 k gave good estimate to the mean value of kernel weight. A previous research by Elsahookie et al (6) studied the best combination of sample sizes and number of replicates to estimate mean value of plant seed yield of maize and sunflower. They found that the best recommended combination was using sample size of 10 plants with 4 replicates. Hertzog (10) reported that sample size should be over 40, while Julious (12) recommended sample size of 12 per group. More studies on other objects of sample sizes are really required.
引用
收藏
页码:1574 / 1578
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION
    CLARK, V
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1991, 87 (03) : 569 - 573
  • [22] SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION
    LUCAS, HL
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1965, 40 (03): : 327 - &
  • [23] SAMPLE-SIZE DETERMINATION
    YOUDEN, WJ
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1965, 37 (06) : A71 - &
  • [24] DETERMINATION OF THE MINIMUM SAMPLE SIZE
    Bakaeva, O. A.
    MORDOVIA UNIVERSITY BULLETIN, 2010, 4 : 111 - 114
  • [25] On Bayesian sample size determination
    Nassar, M. M.
    Khamis, S. M.
    Radwan, S. S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2011, 38 (05) : 1045 - 1054
  • [26] Sample size determination: A review
    Adcock, CJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1997, 46 (02) : 261 - 283
  • [27] ON THE DETERMINATION OF SAMPLE SIZES IN DESIGNING EXPERIMENTS
    HARRIS, M
    HORVITZ, DG
    MOOD, AM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1948, 43 (243) : 391 - 402
  • [28] Sample size determination in clinical proteomic profiling experiments using mass spectrometry for class comparison
    Cairns, David A.
    Barrett, Jennifer H.
    Billingham, Lucinda J.
    Stanley, Anthea J.
    Xinarianos, George
    Field, John K.
    Johnson, Phillip J.
    Selby, Peter J.
    Banks, Rosamonde E.
    PROTEOMICS, 2009, 9 (01) : 74 - 86
  • [29] Sample Size Determination With False Discovery Rate Adjustment for Experiments With High-Dimensional Data
    Cai, Gengqian
    Lin, Xiwu
    Lee, Kwan
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 2 (02): : 165 - 174
  • [30] CHOICE OF SAMPLE-SIZE IN PARASITOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS
    HEALY, MJR
    PARASITOLOGY TODAY, 1987, 3 (03): : 91 - 94