Regional social trust and corporate environmental opportunistic disclosure: evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Yao, Sheng [1 ]
Zhu, Ye [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Regional social trust; EOD; corporate conduct; external supervision; environmental liability; C33; M14; Z13; INFORMATION DISCLOSURE; SOCIETAL TRUST; RESPONSIBILITY; INSTITUTIONS; FDI;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2387372
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In-depth research on social trust has revealed that it plays a crucial role in economic growth. Regional Social trust has a positive and significant effect on corporate financial information. It remains unknown whether regional social trust has the same effect on the environmental opportunistic disclosure (EOD). EOD is defined as soft information disclosure that is not quantifiable and verifiable. Our study analyzes whether regional social trust negatively affects EOD. Using data from A-share listed companies in China from 2016 to 2019, we find that regional social trust negatively affects EOD. This effect is particularly pronounced in areas with strong economic development, legal systems, and corporations with weak internal controls, strict external audits, and no punishment from environmental supervision. Regional social trust negatively impacts EOD with foreign direct investment as an intervening variable. After conducting robustness checks and an endogeneity test, our findings remain consistent. These findings validate the role of regional social trust in enhancing environmental information disclosure, which contributes to the information transparency of the capital market. Overall, it is essential to continue to improve the credit system and the regulation of environmental information disclosure.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Insights from analyzing corporate environmental and social disclosure
    Sebastianelli, Rose
    Tamimi, Nabil
    Isil, Ozgur
    Rocco, Vincent
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2025, 63 (03) : 803 - 823
  • [42] Stakeholder Power towards Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia
    Hamzah, Noradiva
    Abdltllah, Maizatulakma
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 10 : 1 - 10
  • [43] Board size, social trust, and corporate risk taking: Evidence from China
    Su, Kun
    Liu, Heng
    Zhang, Han
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2019, 40 (06) : 596 - 609
  • [44] Can the social trust promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China
    Pan, Zicheng
    Liu, Liang
    Bai, Shuyuan
    Ma, Qianting
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (37) : 52157 - 52173
  • [45] Can the social trust promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China
    Zicheng Pan
    Liang Liu
    Shuyuan Bai
    Qianting Ma
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 52157 - 52173
  • [46] Does social trust affect corporate environmental performance in China?
    Chen, Zhongfei
    Chen, Fanglin
    Zhou, Mengling
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 102
  • [47] Economic policy uncertainty and corporate social responsibility disclosure similarity: Evidence from China
    Xue, Xingnan
    Wang, Liwen
    Hu, Nan
    BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2024, 56 (05):
  • [48] How does social media drive corporate carbon disclosure? Evidence from China
    Shao, Jing
    He, Zhiwei
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 10
  • [49] Loan Guarantees, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Audit Fees: Evidence from China
    Fangjun Wang
    Luying Xu
    Fei Guo
    Junrui Zhang
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 166 : 293 - 309
  • [50] Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China
    Dai, Jingwen
    Lu, Chao
    Qi, Jipeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (02)