Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study

被引:2
|
作者
Thornton, Madeline [1 ]
Mann, Emily S. [2 ]
Bullington, Brooke W. [3 ]
Hartheimer, Joline [1 ]
Arora, Kavita Shah [4 ]
Allison, Bianca A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 231 McNider Bldg CB 7225 333 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
adolescent; contraceptive counseling; shared decision-making; HEALTH-CARE; YOUNG-ADULTS; BARRIERS; PROVIDER; BIAS; PERSPECTIVES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1111/psrh.12283
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adolescent contraceptive decision-making is influenced by a number of patient and clinician-driven factors. Although the AAP continues to endorse an efficacy-based model of contraceptive counseling, many professional organizations are shifting to a shared decision-making model as the optimal approach for providing unbiased and patient-driven contraceptive counseling. While SDM is intended to reduce the influence of clinician bias, it can exacerbate inequity if a clinician tailors a conversation based on their assumptions of a patient's goals or preferences. In this qualitative study, we explored self-reported contraceptive counseling practices among US-based clinicians who see adolescent patients to assess how these practices create barriers or facilitators to SDM and person-centered contraceptive care. Methods: We interviewed 16 clinicians at the 2022 AAP Annual Meeting who counsel adolescent patients about contraception. We used thematic content analysis to analyze interview transcripts using Dedoose. Results: We identified six aspects of contraceptive counseling that clinicians commonly employed with adolescent patients. These were: (1) sociodemographic characteristics driving counseling, (2) reliance on tiered effectiveness counseling, (3) initiating counseling conversations using "ask then explain" or "explain then ask" approaches, (4) emphasis on teen pregnancy prevention, (5) the influence of method accessibility on counseling, and (6) parental involvement in decision-making and patient confidentiality. We describe how these themes align with or diverge from each component of the SDM framework. Conclusion: Clinicians in this study frequently engaged in non-patient-centered techniques during contraceptive counseling with adolescents. These findings can inform practice recommendations to support clinicians in providing high-quality contraceptive counseling using shared decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HUSBANDS AND WIVES PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR ROLE IN FAMILY DECISION-MAKING - IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTRACEPTIVE USE
    ALCANTARA, AN
    POPULATION INDEX, 1988, 54 (03) : 473 - 473
  • [32] PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT IN CONTRACEPTIVE ACCESS AND DECISION-MAKING: QUALITATIVE FINDINGS FROM ADOLESCENT CONTRACEPTIVE USERS IN ATLANTA, GA
    Steiner, Riley J.
    Cushing, Katherine
    Addison, Stephanie
    Tevendale, Heather
    Carter, Marion
    Dittus, Patricia J.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2019, 64 (02) : S124 - S125
  • [33] What Influences Adolescent Girls' Decision-Making Regarding Contraceptive Methods Use and Childbearing? A Qualitative Exploratory Study in Rangpur District, Bangladesh
    Shahabuddin, A. S. M.
    Nostlinger, Christiana
    Delvaux, Therese
    Sarker, Malabika
    Bardaji, Azucena
    De Brouwere, Vincent
    Broerse, Jacqueline E. W.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [34] Pulmonologists' Reported Use of Guidelines and Shared Decision-making in Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules A Qualitative Study
    Wiener, Renda Soylemez
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    Gillespie, Chris
    Clark, Jack A.
    CHEST, 2015, 148 (06) : 1415 - 1421
  • [35] MAPPING PATIENT PREFERENCES TO CONTRACEPTIVE TREATMENT CHOICE WITH THE USE OF A SHARED DECISION-MAKING AID
    Jiang, Shirley Y.
    Lambrechts, Sylvia
    Munnangi, Meghana
    Kwan, Lorna
    Abutouk, Mona
    Saigal, Christopher S.
    Sridhar, Aparna
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E57 - E58
  • [36] Exploring Perceptions and Practices of Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Education in Palliative Care Settings
    Sultan, Lama
    de Jong, Nynke
    Alsaywid, Basim
    Khan, Muhammad Anwar
    de Nooijer, Jascha
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2024, 15 : 281 - 291
  • [37] Developing a Shared Decision-Making Model for Diabetic Patients: A Qualitative Study
    Vaskouei-Eshkevarei, Khorshid
    Hajinabi, Kamran
    Riahi, Leila
    Maleki, Mohammadreza
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 10
  • [38] A qualitative study on shared decision-making of patients with chronic kidney disease
    Ho, Ya-Fang
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Li, I-Chuan
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (06): : 3430 - 3440
  • [39] Patients' experiences of shared decision-making in nursing care: A qualitative study
    Van Der Ploeg-Dorhout, Marianne Paulina
    Van Den Boogaard, Charina
    Reinders-Messelink, Heleen
    Van Der Cingel, Margreet
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (06) : 2274 - 2286
  • [40] Emergency Medical Services Clinicians' Pediatric Destination Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study
    Fratta, Kyle A.
    Fishe, Jennifer N.
    Schenk, Ellen
    Anders, Jennifer F.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (08)