Distributed Physics-Informed machine learning strategies for two-phase flows

被引:2
|
作者
Radhakrishnan, Gokul [1 ]
Pattamatta, Arvind [1 ]
Srinivasan, Balaji [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Mech Engn, Chennai, India
[2] Wadhwani Sch Data Sci & AI, Chennai, India
关键词
Two-phase flows; Deep Neural Networks; Physics Informed Neural Networks; Distributed Learning Machines; INVERSE PROBLEMS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; LEVEL SET; COMPUTATIONS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104861
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
This study delves into applying Distributed Learning Machines (DLM), a subset of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN), in tackling benchmark challenges within two-phase flows. Specifically, two variants of DLM, namely Distributed Physics-Informed Neural Networks (DPINN) and Transfer Physics-Informed Neural Networks (TPINN), are studied. The DLM architecture strategically divides the global domain into distinct non- overlapping sub-domains, with interconnected solutions facilitated by interface conditions embedded in the loss function. Forward and inverse benchmark problems in two-phase flows are explored: (a) bubble in a reversing vortex and (b) Bubble Rising under Buoyancy. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method handles interface transport in both scenarios, with the inverse problem incorporating interface-position data during the training phase. The forward problem highlights the effectiveness of DPINN in capturing the interface using a simple transport equation. The distinctive contribution of this work lies in its exploration of the inverse problem, offering insights into the scalability of distributed architectures when dealing with a system of governing equations. Following the validation of an initial PINN model against Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) data, the study extends to DPINN and TPINN. A parametric study optimizes network hyperparameters, emphasizing the regularization of loss terms within the DPINN loss function. A self-adaptive weighting strategy based on a Gaussian probabilistic model dynamically adjusts loss weights during training to overcome challenges associated with manual parameter tuning. The evaluation of accuracy against CFD data and published results underscore the efficacy of DLMs in addressing two-phase flow problems. Additionally, the computational efficiency of distributed networks is explored compared to traditional PINNs.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Physics-Informed Machine Learning for DRAM Error Modeling
    Baseman, Elisabeth
    DeBardeleben, Nathan
    Blanchard, Sean
    Moore, Juston
    Tkachenko, Olena
    Ferreira, Kurt
    Siddiqua, Taniya
    Sridharan, Vilas
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DEFECT AND FAULT TOLERANCE IN VLSI AND NANOTECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS (DFT), 2018,
  • [22] Physics-informed Machine Learning for Modeling Turbulence in Supernovae
    Karpov, Platon I.
    Huang, Chengkun
    Sitdikov, Iskandar
    Fryer, Chris L.
    Woosley, Stan
    Pilania, Ghanshyam
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 940 (01):
  • [23] The scaling of physics-informed machine learning with data and dimensions
    Miller S.T.
    Lindner J.F.
    Choudhary A.
    Sinha S.
    Ditto W.L.
    Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X, 2020, 5
  • [24] A Review of Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Fluid Mechanics
    Sharma, Pushan
    Chung, Wai Tong
    Akoush, Bassem
    Ihme, Matthias
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [25] Physics-informed machine learning for inorganic scintillator discovery
    Pilania, G.
    McClellan, K. J.
    Stanek, C. R.
    Uberuaga, B. P.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 148 (24):
  • [26] Probabilistic physics-informed machine learning for dynamic systems
    Subramanian, Abhinav
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 230
  • [27] Predicting glass structure by physics-informed machine learning
    Bodker, Mikkel L.
    Bauchy, Mathieu
    Du, Tao
    Mauro, John C.
    Smedskjaer, Morten M.
    NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [28] Parsimony as the ultimate regularizer for physics-informed machine learning
    J. Nathan Kutz
    Steven L. Brunton
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2022, 107 : 1801 - 1817
  • [29] Parsimony as the ultimate regularizer for physics-informed machine learning
    Kutz, J. Nathan
    Brunton, Steven L.
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2022, 107 (03) : 1801 - 1817
  • [30] Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Optical Modes in Composites
    Ghosh, Abantika
    Elhamod, Mohannad
    Bu, Jie
    Lee, Wei-Cheng
    Karpatne, Anuj
    Podolskiy, Viktor A.
    ADVANCED PHOTONICS RESEARCH, 2022, 3 (11):