POPULATION ADJUSTED-INDIRECT COMPARISONS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A METHODOLOGICAL SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

被引：0
|
作者：
Truong, B. [1 ]
Tran, L. A. T. [2 ]
Le, T. A. [3 ]
Pham, T. T. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Vo, T. T. [7 ]
机构：
[1] Auburn Univ, Harrison Coll Pharm, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[6] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[7] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源：
VALUE IN HEALTH | 2024年 / 27卷 / 06期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
HTA20
引用
收藏
页码：S247 / S247
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ETHICS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Bellemare, Christian A.
    Dagenais, Pierre
    K.-Bedard, Suzanne
    Beland, Jean-Pierre
    Bernier, Louise
    Daniel, Charles-Etienne
    Gagnon, Hubert
    Legault, Georges-Auguste
    Parent, Monelle
    Patenaude, Johane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 34 (05) : 447 - 457
  • [22] A Systematic Review and Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Oral Anticoagulants
    Cui, Juncheng
    Wu, Bei
    Liu, Congwei
    Li, Zhihong
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 37 (11) : 762 - 770
  • [23] MATCHING ADJUSTED INDIRECT COMPARISONS TO ASSESS COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF THERAPIES: USAGE IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS
    Thom, H.
    Jugl, S. M.
    Palaka, E.
    Jawla, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A100 - A101
  • [24] A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
    Christine Kriza
    Jill Hanass-Hancock
    Emmanuel Ankrah Odame
    Nicola Deghaye
    Rashid Aman
    Philip Wahlster
    Mayra Marin
    Nicodemus Gebe
    Willis Akhwale
    Isabelle Wachsmuth
    Peter L. Kolominsky-Rabas
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 12
  • [25] A systematic review of Health Technology Assessment tools in sub-Saharan Africa: methodological issues and implications
    Kriza, Christine
    Hanass-Hancock, Jill
    Odame, Emmanuel Ankrah
    Deghaye, Nicola
    Aman, Rashid
    Wahlster, Philip
    Marin, Mayra
    Gebe, Nicodemus
    Akhwale, Willis
    Wachsmuth, Isabelle
    Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter L.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2014, 12
  • [26] A Comparison of Relative-Efficacy Estimate(S) Derived From Both Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons and Standard Anchored Indirect Treatment Comparisons: A Review of Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons
    Cassidy, Owen
    Harte, Marie
    Trela-Larsen, Lea
    Walsh, Cathal
    White, Arthur
    McCullagh, Laura
    Leahy, Joy
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (11) : 1665 - 1674
  • [27] Adjusted Indirect and Mixed Comparisons of Conservative Treatments for Hallux Valgus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Ying, Jianhua
    Xu, Yining
    Istvan, Biro
    Ren, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (07)
  • [28] A STEPWISE APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF POPULATION-ADJUSTED INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISONS
    Lambton, M.
    Nickel, K.
    Snedecor, S. J.
    Simons, C.
    Ainsworth, C.
    Peina, M.
    Kroep, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S359 - S359
  • [29] Use of Indirect and Mixed Treatment Comparisons for Technology Assessment
    Alex Sutton
    A. E. Ades
    Nicola Cooper
    Keith Abrams
    PharmacoEconomics, 2008, 26 : 753 - 767
  • [30] Methodological considerations in the assessment of direct and indirect costs of back pain: A systematic scoping review
    Zemedikun, Dawit T.
    Kigozi, Jesse
    Wynne-Jones, Gwenllian
    Guariglia, Alessandra
    Roberts, Tracy
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
12345