The anomaly of the CMB power with the latest Planck data

被引:1
|
作者
Billi, M. [1 ,2 ]
Barreiro, R. B. [1 ,2 ]
Martinez-Gonzalez, E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cantabria, Inst Fis Cantabria, CSIC, Ave Castros S-N, Santander 39005, Spain
[2] Osservatorio Astrofis & Sci Spazio, Via Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
关键词
CMBR polarisation; Frequentist statistics; Statistical sampling techniques; CMBR theory; ANISOTROPY; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/080
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The lack of power anomaly is an unexpected feature observed at large angular scales in the maps of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) produced by the COBE, WMAP and Planck satellites. This signature, which consists in a missing of power with respect to that predicted by the Lambda CDM model, might hint at a new cosmological phase before the standard inflationary era. The main point of this paper is taking into account the latest Planck polarisation data to investigate how the CMB polarisation improves the understanding of this feature. With this aim, we apply to the latest Planck data, both PR3 (2018) and PR4 (2020) releases, a new class of estimators capable of evaluating this anomaly by considering temperature and polarisation data both separately and in a jointly way. This is the first time that the PR4 dataset has been used to study this anomaly. To critically evaluate this feature, taking into account the residuals of known systematic effects present in the Planck datasets, we analyse the cleaned CMB maps using different combinations of sky masks, harmonic range and binning on the CMB multipoles. Our analysis shows that the estimator based only on temperature data confirms the presence of a lack of power with a lower-tail-probability (LTP), depending on the component separation method, <= 0.33% and <= 1.76% for PR3 and PR4, respectively. To our knowledge, the LTP <= <= 0.33% for the PR3 dataset is the lowest one present in the literature obtained from Planck 2018 data, considering the Planck confidence mask. We find significant differences between these two datasets when polarisation is taken into account most likely due to a different level of systematics. Especially, the analysis with PR3 data, unlike that with PR4, seems to point towards a lack of power at large scales also for polarisation. Moreover, we also show that for the PR3 dataset the inclusion of the subdominant polarisation information provides estimates that are less likely accepted in a Lambda CDM cosmological model than the only-temperature analysis over the entire harmonic-range considered. In particular, at & ell; max = 26, we found that no simulation has a value as low as the data for all the pipelines.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring CMB polarisation with the Planck HFI
    Delabrouille, J
    Kaplan, J
    ASTROPHYSICAL POLARIZED BACKGROUNDS, 2002, 609 : 135 - 143
  • [42] CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec
    Rosenberg, Erik
    Gratton, Steven
    Efstathiou, George
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 517 (03) : 4620 - 4636
  • [43] Planck 2015 results XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
    Aghanim, N.
    Arnaud, M.
    Ashdown, M.
    Aumont, J.
    Baccigalupi, C.
    Banday, A. J.
    Barreiro, R. B.
    Bartlett, J. G.
    Bartolo, N.
    Battaner, E.
    Benabed, K.
    Benoit, A.
    Benoit-Levy, A.
    Bernard, J. -P.
    Bersanelli, M.
    Bielewicz, P.
    Bock, J. J.
    Bonaldi, A.
    Bonavera, L.
    Bond, J. R.
    Borrill, J.
    Bouchet, F. R.
    Boulanger, F.
    Bucher, M.
    Burigana, C.
    Butler, R. C.
    Calabrese, E.
    Cardoso, J. -F.
    Catalano, A.
    Challinor, A.
    Chiang, H. C.
    Christensen, P. R.
    Clements, D. L.
    Colombo, L. P. L.
    Combet, C.
    Coulais, A.
    Crill, B. P.
    Curto, A.
    Cuttaia, F.
    Danese, L.
    Davies, R. D.
    Davis, R. J.
    de Bernardis, P.
    de Rosa, A.
    de Zotti, G.
    Delabrouille, J.
    Desert, F. -X.
    Di Valentino, E.
    Dickinson, C.
    Diego, J. M.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2016, 594
  • [44] Revisiting the A L Lensing Anomaly in Planck 2018 Temperature Data
    Addison, Graeme E.
    Bennett, Charles L.
    Halpern, Mark
    Hinshaw, Gary
    Weiland, Janet L.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 974 (02):
  • [45] Minkowski functionals of CMB polarization intensity with pynkowski: theory and application to Planck and future data
    Carones, Alessandro
    CarronDuque, Javier
    Marinucci, Domenico
    Migliaccio, Marina
    Vittorio, Nicola
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 527 (01) : 756 - 773
  • [46] Particle production during inflation: a Bayesian analysis with CMB data from Planck 2018
    Naik, Suvedha Suresh
    Furuuchi, Kazuyuki
    Chingangbam, Pravabati
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2022, (07):
  • [47] CMB signatures of metal-free star formation and Planck 2015 polarization data
    Miranda, Vinicius
    Lidz, Adam
    Heinrich, Chen He
    Hu, Wayne
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 467 (04) : 4050 - 4056
  • [48] Joint Planck and WMAP CMB map reconstruction
    Bobin, J.
    Sureau, F.
    Starck, J. -L.
    Rassat, A.
    Paykari, P.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2014, 563
  • [49] The CMB derivatives of Planck's beam asymmetry
    Rathaus, Ben
    Kovetz, Ely D.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 443 (01) : 750 - 754
  • [50] QUANTIFYING DISCORDANCE IN THE 2015 PLANCK CMB SPECTRUM
    Addison, G. E.
    Huang, Y.
    Watts, D. J.
    Bennett, C. L.
    Halpern, M.
    Hinshaw, G.
    Weiland, J. L.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 818 (02):