Effects of structured contraceptive counseling in young women: Secondary analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial (the LOWE trial)

被引:0
|
作者
Iwarsson, Karin Emtell [1 ,2 ]
Podolskyi, Volodymyr [1 ,2 ]
Bizjak, Isabella [1 ,2 ]
Kallner, Helena Kopp [3 ,4 ]
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina [1 ,2 ]
Envall, Niklas [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Div Gynecol & Reprod Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Danderyd Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Dalarna Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Falun, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
adolescent; contraception; contraceptive; counseling; directive counseling; long-acting reversible contraception; young adult; ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14954
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionUnwanted pregnancy constitutes a huge health issue. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) are the most effective methods for preventing unwanted pregnancy, especially among young women. This study evaluates the intervention effect of structured contraceptive counseling on the choice, initiation, and use of LARC in young women. Material and MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of women aged 18-25, enrolled in a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial performed in abortion, youth, and maternal health clinics across the Stockholm County in Sweden. Clinics were randomized (1:1) to provide structured contraceptive counseling (intervention) or standard counseling (control). Surveys were administered at the clinic visit and follow-ups at 3, 6, and 12 months. Primary outcome focused on the choice of LARC among women 18-25 years of age. Secondary outcomes included initiation, and use of LARC at 3 and 12 months, satisfaction with the counseling received and information on extended use of combined hormonal contraceptives. The study was registered at (NCT03269357). ResultsFrom September 2017 to May 2019, 770 women aged 18-25 years from 28 clinics/clusters were recruited. There was a significant intervention effect on LARC choice (aOR 5.96, 95% CI 3.25-10.94), initiation (aOR 4.43, 95% CI 2.32-8.46), and use at 12 months (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.31-3.73). The odds of LARC choice at pre-booked visits were higher and more women received information about extended-use regimen for short-acting reversible contraception in the intervention group compared to the control group. The intervention package was well received, but with higher satisfaction at pre-booked compared to drop-in visits. ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that comprehensive structured contraceptive counseling significantly increases LARC choice, initiation and use, with high satisfaction among young participants, especially at pre-booked visits. The results highlight an approach that merits implementation to increase quality of care in contraceptive services, to enhance reproductive health for adolescents and young adults.
引用
收藏
页码:2242 / 2251
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of prenatal counseling on postpartum follow-up and contraceptive use in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial
    Phaloprakarn, Chadakarn
    Suthasmalee, Sasiwan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (10)
  • [32] Cognitive Behavioral Counseling and Sleep Quality in Pregnant Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Khatibi, Soheila
    Kazemi, Morteza
    Zenoozian, Saeideh
    Vakili, Mohammad Masoud
    Kharaghani, Roghieh
    CURRENT SLEEP MEDICINE REPORTS, 2021, 7 (03) : 120 - 128
  • [33] Cognitive Behavioral Counseling and Sleep Quality in Pregnant Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Soheila Khatibi
    Morteza Kazemi
    Saeideh Zenoozian
    Mohammad Masoud Vakili
    Roghieh Kharaghani
    Current Sleep Medicine Reports, 2021, 7 : 120 - 128
  • [34] Counseling lifestyle changes in overweight/obese pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial
    Facchinetti, Fabio
    Zoccoli, Sofia Gambigliani
    Petrella, Elisabetta
    Bertarini, Valentina
    Di Cerbo, Lidia
    Neri, Isabella
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S120 - S121
  • [35] Urodynamics: Imposition or not as bad as it seems? Secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial
    Gross, O.
    Kasten, M.
    Wettstein, M.
    Anderson, C. E.
    Birkhauser, V
    Borer, J.
    Koschorke, M.
    Liechti, M. D.
    Mccallin, S.
    Mehnert, U.
    Rothlisberger, R.
    Sadri, H.
    Stachele, L.
    Van der Lely, S.
    Kessler, T. M.
    Leitner, L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1194 - S1194
  • [36] ATTICUS RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL - RESULTS OF PRE-SPECIFIED SECONDARY ANALYSES
    Poli, S.
    Keller, T.
    Martus, P.
    Poli, K.
    Ziemann, U.
    Geisler, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2022, 17 (3_SUPPL) : 145 - 145
  • [37] Effects of Two Educational Posters on Contraceptive Knowledge and Intentions A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Anderson, Seri
    Frerichs, Leah
    Kaysin, Alexander
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Halpern, Carolyn Tucker
    Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 (01): : 53 - 62
  • [38] Effects of initiating a contraceptive implant on subsequent condom use: A randomized controlled trial
    Rattray, Carole
    Wiener, Jeffrey
    Legardy-Williams, Jennifer
    Costenbader, Elizabeth
    Pazol, Karen
    Medley-Singh, Natalie
    Snead, Margaret C.
    Steiner, Markus J.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Warner, Lee
    Gallo, Maria F.
    Hylton-Kong, Tina
    Kourtis, Athena P.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (06) : 560 - 566
  • [39] A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of structured goal-setting following stroke
    Taylor, William J.
    Brown, Melanie
    William, Levack
    McPherson, Kathryn M.
    Reed, Kirk
    Dean, Sarah G.
    Weatherall, Mark
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 26 (04) : 327 - 338
  • [40] User-Centered Counseling and Male Involvement in Contraceptive Decision Making: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Karra, Mahesh
    Zhang, Kexin
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (04):