The Effects of Layout Order on Interface Complexity: An Eye-Tracking Study for Dashboard Design

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Nuowen [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
Jiang, Shangsong [1 ]
Ge, Weijia [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Furnishings & Ind Design, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
human-computer interface; eye-tracking; dashboard; interface complexity; layout order; COMPUTER-INTERFACE; INFORMATION; MOVEMENTS; AMBIGUITY; MEMORY; BIASES;
D O I
10.3390/s24185966
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study investigated the effect of layout order on the complexity of the dashboard interface based on screen-based eye trackers. By simplifying and abstracting dashboard interfaces and incorporating subjective ratings (symmetry and unity calculations), we successfully manipulated the levels of complexity and layout order of the interface materials. Using four types of eye movement data (total fixation count, total gaze duration, scanning paths, and hotspot maps) and behavioral data, we compared participants' visual search behavior on interfaces with different layout orders and complexity levels. Experiment 1 revealed a significant interaction between layout order and interface complexity, with participants performing significantly better in the high-level layout order condition. Experiment 2 confirmed that the position of the core chart plays a crucial role in users' visual search behavior and that the optimal layout order for the dashboard is to place the core chart on the left side of the interface's horizontal axis, with partial symmetry in the no-core chart areas. This study highlights the effectiveness of eye-tracking techniques in user interface design research and provides valuable insights into optimizing dashboard interface design. Designers should adopt the design principle of "order is more" in addition to "less is more" and consider designing the core chart in the left-center position.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Design and validation of a simple eye-tracking system
    Liston, Dorion B.
    Simpson, Sol
    Wone, Lily R.
    Rich, Mark
    Stone, Leland S.
    2016 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON EYE TRACKING RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS (ETRA 2016), 2016, : 221 - 224
  • [42] An Eye-Tracking Study of Query Reformulation
    Eickhoff, Carsten
    Dungs, Sebastian
    Tran, Vu
    SIGIR 2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2015, : 13 - 22
  • [43] EYE-TRACKING STUDY OF ANIMATE OBJECTS
    Kovic, Vanja
    Plunkett, Kim
    Westermann, Gert
    PSIHOLOGIJA, 2009, 42 (03) : 307 - 327
  • [44] Looking behind eye-catching design: an eye-tracking study on wine bottle design preference
    Merdian, Peter
    Piroth, Philipp
    Rueger-Muck, Edith
    Raab, Gerhard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WINE BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (01) : 134 - 151
  • [45] The impact of live background visual complexity on consumer purchase intention: an eye-tracking study
    Tang, Xiaoli
    Li, Xiaoli
    Hao, Zefeng
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2024, 36 (10) : 2539 - 2557
  • [46] Getting at the Cognitive Complexity of Linguistic Metadata Annotation - A Pilot Study Using Eye-Tracking
    Lohmann, Steffen
    Tomanek, Katrin
    Ziegler, Juergen
    Hahn, Udo
    COGNITION IN FLUX, 2010, : 2146 - 2151
  • [47] Exploring the Complexity of the L2 Intonation System: An Acoustic and Eye-Tracking Study
    Liu, Di
    Reed, Marnie
    FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2021, 6
  • [48] An Eye-Tracking Study on the Word Order Preference and the Effect of Phrasal Length in Korean
    Nam, Yunju
    Chung, Hyenyung
    Kim, Youngjoo
    COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2021, 26 (04): : 964 - 974
  • [49] Context congruity effects of online product recommendations: an eye-tracking study
    Luan, Jing
    Yao, Zhong
    Shen, Yongchao
    Xiao, Jie
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2018, 42 (06) : 847 - 863
  • [50] Eye-Tracking Analysis of User Behavior with an Active Display Interface
    Ito, Teruaki
    Watanabe, Tomio
    ADVANCES IN AFFECTIVE AND PLEASURABLE DESIGN (AHFE 2017), 2018, 585 : 72 - 77