Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Preparation Designs and Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Laminate Veneers: An In Vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Soni, Pranjal S. [1 ]
Sanyal, Pronob [1 ]
机构
[1] Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth Deemed Univ, Sch Dent Sci, Dept Prosthodont & Crown & Bridge, Karad, India
关键词
instron universal testing machine; tooth preparation for laminate veneer; fracture resistance; upcera; BITE FORCE; PORCELAIN;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.66811
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Laminate veneers are thin porcelain or composite resin shells bonded to the front of teeth for cosmetic enhancement. The design of the tooth preparation is crucial; it involves minimal enamel removal to ensure a proper fit and strong bond. This careful preparation increases the veneers' fracture resistance by preserving tooth structure and evenly distributing stress, ensuring durability and natural appearance. Aim Our aim was to determine the fracture resistance of two preparation designs with two different materials for the fabrication of laminate veneers. Materials and methods An in vitro study was conducted on 40 laminate veneers divided into two groups based on the material used: Group 1 (Cerec Tessera (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA)) and Group 2 (Upcera, Shenzhen, China). Each group was further divided into two sub-groups based on tooth preparation designs: butt joint and feather edge. The fracture resistance of these veneers following thermocycling was determined, and the mode of fracture was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Results Feather edge preparation with Cerec Tessera laminate veneer restoration demonstrated the highest fracture resistance at 111.5 N, followed by butt joint preparation with Cerec Tessera laminate veneer restoration, which showed a fracture resistance of 90.8 N. The study identified laminate fractures as the most common type of fracture observed in the veneer restorations, followed by cement interface fractures. Conclusion The study suggests that the feather edge preparation design contributed to higher fracture resistance compared to the butt joint design. This finding aligns with the idea that modifying the preparation design can have a significant impact on the overall strength and durability of veneer restorations. The use of Cerec Tessera, especially in combination with the feather edge design, yielded the maximum fracture resistance.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Restorative Materials: An In vitro Study
    Manas, Abhigyan
    Kumar, Amit
    Gawali, Kranti Sorte
    Ismail, Prabu Mahin Syed
    Goutam, Manish
    Das, Indrani
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 14 : 977 - 979
  • [42] In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of teeth with incomplete root development and intracanal reinforcement with different materials
    Cabrales Salgado, Ricardo
    Carvajal Cabrales, Katherine
    Pupo Marrugo, Stella
    Hernandez Gonzalez, Daniel Fernando
    Gracia Barcenas, Jose Luis
    INVESTIGACION CLINICA, 2012, 53 (03): : 262 - 272
  • [43] A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
    Makade, Chetana S.
    Meshram, Ganesh K.
    Warhadpande, Manjusha
    Patil, Pravinkumar G.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2011, 3 (02): : 90 - 95
  • [44] Influence of Different Zirconia Coping Designs on the Fracture Resistance of All-Ceramic Crowns: An In Vitro Study
    Shetty, Sanath K.
    Fayaz, Tharammal
    Zahid, Mohammed
    Suhaim, Karkala S.
    Ragher, Mallikarjun
    Hasan, Mohammed S.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 12 : 517 - 522
  • [45] Comparative evaluation of fracture toughness and marginal adaptation of two restorative materials in nonendodontically and endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study
    Mashyakhy, M.
    Jabali, A.
    Karale, R.
    Parthiban, G.
    Sajeev, S.
    Bhandi, S.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 23 (03) : 349 - 354
  • [46] The effect of different materials and cavity designs on fracture resistance of ceramic partial coverage
    Attia, Mahmoud
    Fahmy, Nadia
    Shaker, Atef
    Salah, Tarek
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 36 (10) : 1459 - 1465
  • [47] Effect of different ceramic materials and substructure designs on fracture resistance in anterior restorations
    Jo, Eun-Hye
    Huh, Yoon-Hyuk
    Ko, Kyung-Ho
    Park, Chan-Jin
    Cho, Lee-Ra
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 127 (05): : 785 - 792
  • [48] Comparative In Vitro Biocompatibility Study of the Two Orthodontic Bonding Materials of Different Types
    Janosevic, Predrag
    Stojanovic, Sanja
    Stojanovic, Ivana
    Janosevic, Mirjana
    Najman, Stevo
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [49] Influence of different composite materials and cavity preparation designs on the fracture resistance of mesio-occluso-distal inlay restoration
    Tekce, Neslihan
    Pala, Kansad
    Demirci, Mustafa
    Tuncer, Safa
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2016, 35 (03) : 523 - 531
  • [50] Comparative Evaluation of the Surface Hardness of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study
    Samuel, Anoop
    Raju, Rinsa
    Sreejith, K. B.
    Kalathil, Binitha M.
    Nenavath, Deepthi
    Chaitra, V. S.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 12 : 124 - 128