Connectivity study on resting-state EEG between motor imagery BCI-literate and BCI-illiterate groups

Objective. Although motor imagery-based brain-computer interface (MI-BCI) holds significant potential, its practical application faces challenges such as BCI-illiteracy. To mitigate this issue, researchers have attempted to predict BCI-illiteracy by using the resting state, as this was found to be associated with BCI performance. As connectivity's significance in neuroscience has grown, BCI researchers have applied connectivity to it. However, the issues of connectivity have not been considered fully. First, although various connectivity metrics exist, only some have been used to predict BCI-illiteracy. This is problematic because each metric has a distinct hypothesis and perspective to estimate connectivity, resulting in different outcomes according to the metric. Second, the frequency range affects the connectivity estimation. In addition, it is still unknown whether each metric has its own optimal frequency range. Third, the way that estimating connectivity may vary depending upon the dataset has not been investigated. Meanwhile, we still do not know a great deal about how the resting state electroencephalography (EEG) network differs between BCI-literacy and -illiteracy. Approach. To address the issues above, we analyzed three large public EEG datasets using three functional connectivity and three effective connectivity metrics by employing diverse graph theory measures. Our analysis revealed that the appropriate frequency range to predict BCI-illiteracy varies depending upon the metric. The alpha range was found to be suitable for the metrics of the frequency domain, while alpha + theta were found to be appropriate for multivariate Granger causality. The difference in network efficiency between BCI-literate and -illiterate groups was constant regardless of the metrics and datasets used. Although we observed that BCI-literacy had stronger connectivity, no other significant constructional differences were found. Significance. Based upon our findings, we predicted MI-BCI performance for the entire dataset. We discovered that combining several graph features could improve the prediction's accuracy.