Impact of agricultural product brands and agricultural industry agglomeration on agricultural carbon emissions

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Sihui [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Xiaowei [2 ]
Sun, Yong [3 ]
Xiong, Yanling [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Res Ctr Rural Policy, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
Agricultural product brands; Geographical indications; Carbon emissions; Industrial agglomeration; Scale operation; GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS; GOVERNMENT; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122238
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural carbon emissions pose a significant challenge in combating climate change and achieving sustainable development objectives. These emissions predominantly stem from the decisions made by stakeholders, and the potential economic and social benefits associated with agricultural product brands determine their capacity to influence stakeholder behavior. This study utilizes panel data from 30 provinces in China spanning from 2008 to 2021 to examine the impact of agricultural product brands on agricultural carbon emission intensity and its underlying mechanisms. The findings indicate that: (1) Agricultural product brands contribute to lowering agricultural carbon emission intensity within a region, while also exerting a negative spillover effect on neighboring areas. (2) Agricultural product brands foster a decline in agricultural carbon emission intensity by bolstering the agricultural industry agglomeration. (3) Agricultural scale operation exhibits a threshold effect between agricultural product brands and agricultural carbon emission intensity, with the mitigation effect becoming increasingly pronounced as the threshold range expands. The research findings can offer valuable insights into leveraging the advantages of agricultural product brands to facilitate the reduction of agricultural carbon emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence Paths and Spillover Effects of Agricultural Agglomeration on Agricultural Green Development
    Xu, Pei
    Jin, Zehu
    Tang, Huan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [42] Activated carbon from an agricultural by-product, for the treatment of dyeing industry wastewater
    Kadirvelu, K
    Palanival, M
    Kalpana, R
    Rajeswari, S
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 74 (03) : 263 - 265
  • [43] Consumer preferences for agricultural product brands in an E-commerce environment
    Wang, Erpeng
    Liu, Zhenzhen
    Gao, Zhifeng
    Wen, Qin
    Geng, Xianhui
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2022, 38 (02) : 312 - 327
  • [44] The impacts of agricultural subsidies of Common Agricultural Policy on agricultural emissions: The case of the European Union
    Balogh, Jeremias Mate
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2023, 69 (04): : 140 - 150
  • [45] Reducing Agricultural Emissions
    Huang Jiangqin
    China Report ASEAN, 2023, 8(Z2) (Z2) : 30 - 32
  • [46] Agricultural Economic Evidence and Policy Prospects under Agricultural Trade Shocks and Carbon Dioxide Emissions
    Kang, Jian
    Zhao, Minjuan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 2022
  • [48] The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China
    Li, Chen
    Chen, Guohua
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Li, Yajin
    Ding, Weichao
    Yu, Xiuxiu
    He, Bing
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2025, 34 (02): : 1593 - 1605
  • [49] The impact of the biogas industry on agricultural sector in Germany
    Lajdova, Zuzana
    Lajda, Jan
    Bielik, Peter
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2016, 62 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [50] Agricultural Product Prices
    Mounter, Stuart
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 60 (02) : E1 - E2