Comparison of postoperative chronic inguinal pain between the lichtenstein and laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Lyra, Valentina Guidi [1 ]
dos Santos, Sofia Brandao [1 ]
Rocha, Carolina Bevilacqua Trigo [1 ]
Guimaraes, Fernando Augusto Garcia [1 ]
Riva, Wagner Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Univ Lusiada, Fac Ciencias Med Santos, Dept Gen Surg, St Oswaldo Cruz 179 Boqueirao, Santos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Inguinal hernia; Chronic postoperative pain; Postoperative inguinodynia; TAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal repair); TEP (total extraperitoneal repair); Lichtenstein technique; REPAIR; OUTCOMES; EXTRAPERITONEAL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-024-03099-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeCurrently, inguinal hernias are highly prevalent in the Brazilian population, accounting for 75% of all abdominal wall hernias. The recommended treatment to correct them is inguinal herniorrhaphy, which can be performed through open surgery, mainly using the Lichtenstein technique, or laparoscopically, primarily through Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP) or Total Extraperitoneal Repair (TEP) approaches. Like any surgery, these procedures have post-operative complications, with pain being the most common and debilitating. Currently, in European and Brazilian guidelines, the open Lichtenstein and endoscopic inguinal hernia techniques are recommended as best evidence-based options for repair of a primary unilateral hernia providing the surgeon is sufficiently experienced in the specific procedure. In that matter, the surgeon should make a choice based on assessment of the benefits and risks of performing each of them, and practice shared making decision with it patient. Therefore, the objective of this review was to assess the incidence of chronic postoperative pain by comparing the aforementioned surgical approaches to evaluate which procedure causes less disability to the patient.MethodsThe search conducted until May 2024 was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Lilacs databases. The selection was limited to randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TAPP or TEP to LC, evaluating the incidence of chronic postoperative pain published between 2017 and 2023. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool, and bias risk was evaluated with the RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS I tool. Thirteen studies were included. ResultsThe meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the groups in both techniques, favoring the laparoscopic approach, which had a lower occurrence of postoperative inguinodynia with a relative risk of 0.49 (95% CI = 0.32, 0.75; I2 = 66% (P = 0.001); Z = 3.28 (P = 0.001) with low certainty of evidence.ConclusionThe presence of chronic postoperative pain was lower in laparoscopic TEP/TAPP techniques when compared to the open Lichtenstein technique, meaning that the former can bring more benefits to patients who requires inguinal herniorrhaphy. Nevertheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize the analysis, minimizing the bias.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1546
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Chun
    Deng, Shaoping
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (03) : 1164 - 1173
  • [22] Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leonardo Solaini
    Davide Cavaliere
    Andrea Avanzolini
    Giuseppe Rocco
    Giorgio Ercolani
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 775 - 781
  • [23] THE IMPACT OF SMOKING ON VENTRAL AND INGUINAL HERNIA POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Lima, D. L.
    Kasmirski, J.
    da Silveira, C. A. Balthazar
    Rasador, A. C.
    Kasakewitch, J. P. G.
    Nogueira, R.
    Malcher, F.
    Sreeramoju, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [24] Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Solaini, Leonardo
    Cavaliere, Davide
    Avanzolini, Andrea
    Rocco, Giuseppe
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (04) : 775 - 781
  • [25] Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qabbani, Amjad
    Aboumarzouk, Omar M.
    ElBakry, Tamer
    Al-Ansari, Abdulla
    Elakkad, Mohamed S.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (11) : 2277 - 2287
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty for inguinal hernias: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sun, Li
    Shen, Ying-Mo
    Chen, Jie
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 29 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [27] Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis
    Decker, E.
    Currie, A.
    Baig, M. K.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (03) : 541 - 546
  • [28] Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis
    E. Decker
    A. Currie
    M. K. Baig
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 541 - 546
  • [29] Learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
    Sivakumar, Jonathan
    Chen, Qianyu
    Hii, Michael W.
    Cullinan, Mark
    Choi, Julian
    Steven, Mark
    Crosthwaite, Gary
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (04): : 2453 - 2475
  • [30] Learning curve of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
    Jonathan Sivakumar
    Qianyu Chen
    Michael W. Hii
    Mark Cullinan
    Julian Choi
    Mark Steven
    Gary Crosthwaite
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 2453 - 2475