How does perceived ease of information access affect investors' judgments?

被引:0
|
作者
Cikurel, Deni [1 ]
机构
[1] Depaul Univ, Sch Accountancy & MIS, 1 East Jackson Blvd,Suite 6000, Chicago, IL 60604 USA
关键词
depth of processing; earnings fixation; Google effect; investor judgment; perceived ease of information access; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; INTERNET-SEARCH; EARNINGS; DISCLOSURE; PURSUIT; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; VALUATION; MEMORY; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1111/1911-3846.12979
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates how using technologies that increase the perceived ease of information access, such as search engines, can affect investors' judgments. Relying on the "Google effect" theory, I predict that using a search engine to access financial information will lead to shallower processing of that information, causing earnings fixation. The results of three experiments support this prediction and the theoretical process. Specifically, investors who access financials via a search engine are less likely to react to the information in the income statement other than earnings compared to those who do not use a search engine. In addition, search condition investors are more likely to mention earnings in their investment reasoning and find earnings more influential than the control condition investors. Furthermore, search condition investors believe that information is more likely to be available in the future and are more likely to reopen the income statement. A second experiment shows that the knowledge that the information will be easily reaccessed increases investors' earnings fixation. Finally, a third experiment provides evidence that using a search engine reduces the depth of information processing. This study extends accounting research by showing that using technologies that increase the perceived ease of information access can reduce investors' processing depth and information acquisition.
引用
收藏
页码:2325 / 2353
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A breast reconstruction needs assessment: How does self-efficacy affect information access and preferences?
    Lam, Andrea
    Secord, Scott
    Butler, Kate
    Hofer, Stefan O. P.
    Liu, Emily
    Metcalfe, Kelly A.
    Zhong, Toni
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 20 (01): : 37 - 42
  • [22] How does national culture affect citizens' rights of access to personal health information and informed consent?
    Cockcroft, Sophie
    Sandhu, Neelam
    Norris, Anthony
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (03) : 229 - 243
  • [23] How Does Asymmetric Information Affect Catering Behavior?
    Lin, Szu-Hsien
    Lai, Huei-Hwa
    Hsu, Ai-Chi
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2018, 54 (11) : 2433 - 2454
  • [24] How does information quality affect stock returns?
    Veronesi, P
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (02): : 807 - 837
  • [25] DOES THE LAW AFFECT MORAL JUDGMENTS
    WALKER, N
    ARGYLE, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 1964, 4 (06): : 570 - 581
  • [26] How Does Access to the Unsecured Debt Market Affect Investment?
    Biguri, Kizkitza
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2023, 152
  • [27] How does electronic cigarette access affect adolescent smoking?
    Friedman, Abigail S.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 44 : 300 - 308
  • [28] How Does Disclosure of Component Auditor Use Affect Nonprofessional Investors' Perceptions and Behavior?
    Hux, Candice T.
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2021, 40 (01): : 35 - 54
  • [29] How does the size of the difference affect perceived larger color differences?
    Kuehni, RG
    COLOR RESEARCH AND APPLICATION, 2000, 25 (05): : 381 - 381
  • [30] How does ownership concentration exacerbate information asymmetry among equity investors?
    Byun, Hae-Young
    Hwang, Lee-Seok
    Lee, Woo-Jong
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2011, 19 (05) : 511 - 534