Incision Closure for Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference in the Rate of Superficial Wound Complications With Suture Versus Staples?

被引:0
|
作者
Hlas, Arman C. [1 ]
Marinier, Michael C. [1 ]
Ogunsola, Ayobami S. [1 ]
Elkins, Jacob M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
surgical staples; skin suture; surgical wound complications; direct anterior approach; total hip arthroplasty; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.62145
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (DA-THA) has increased in popularity over recent decades. However, DA-THA has been reported to have a higher incidence of superficial wound complications, including infection and incisional dehiscence, compared to other surgical approaches to hip arthroplasty. While this indicates a need for optimal wound closure, little research exists on the preferred method of skin closure following DA-THA. This study aimed to determine if there was any difference in rates of superficial infection, wound dehiscence, or overall wound complications with skin closure using a running subcuticular 3-0 Monocryl (R) suture compared to surgical staples following DA-THA. Methods Records of patients who underwent DA-THA at our institution between July 2017 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were abstracted on patient demographics, comorbidities, skin closure method, and wound complications from the electronic medical record. Superficial infection and wound dehiscence were classified based on explicit diagnosis in post-operative records and incision photographs taken during follow-up visits. Overall wound complications were classified in patients who experienced either superficial infection, incisional dehiscence, or both complications following surgery. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared measures were obtained from post-operative patient data, and significance was set at p <= 0.05. Results A total of 365 DA-THAs were completed in 349 patients. A running subcuticular 3-0 Monocryl (R) suture closed 207 surgeries (56.7%), while surgical staples closed 158 surgeries (43.3%). There was no significant difference in independent rates of superficial infection (p = 0.076) or wound dehiscence (p = 0.118) between suture and staple cohorts; however, suture closure (10, 2.7%) was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall wound complications compared to staple closure (1, 0.3%) (p = 0.020). Conclusion DA-THA carries the risk of overall wound complications, including superficial infection and wound dehiscence. Our findings suggest superficial skin closure with staples may be preferred over sutures due to lower rates of overall wound complications. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of skin closure following DA-THA.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Similar complications and outcomes with simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty with the direct anterior approach: A comparative study
    Koutserimpas, Christos
    Rob, Edouard
    Servien, Elvire
    Lustig, Sebastien
    Batailler, Cecile
    SICOT-J, 2024, 10
  • [32] Comparing Dermabond PRINEO versus Dermabond or staples for wound closure: a randomized control trial following total shoulder arthroplasty
    Eichinger, Josef K.
    Oldenburg, Kirsi S.
    Lin, Jackie
    Wilkie, Erin
    Mock, Lisa
    Tavana, M. Lance
    Friedman, Richard J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (10) : 2066 - 2075
  • [33] Single-Incision Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Standard Operating Table
    Lovell, Tim P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2008, 23 (07): : 64 - 68
  • [34] For many but not for all: the bikini incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. A narrative review
    Faldini, Cesare
    Traina, Francesco
    Pilla, Federico
    D'Agostino, Claudio
    Brunello, Matteo
    Guaitoli, Manuele Morandi
    Di Martino, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [35] Fluoroscopy Versus Imageless Optical Navigation in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Manzo, Marc A.
    Lex, Johnathan R.
    Rodriguez-Elizalde, Sebastian Rahul
    Perlus, Ryan
    Cayen, Barry
    Chang, Justin S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2024, 32 (06) : e284 - e292
  • [36] Patient's perspective on direct anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty
    Radoicic, Dragan
    Zec, Vladimir
    Elassuity, Walaa Ikram
    Azab, Mostafa Abdelmaboud
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (12) : 2771 - 2775
  • [37] Patient’s perspective on direct anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty
    Dragan Radoicic
    Vladimir Zec
    Walaa Ikram Elassuity
    Mostafa Abdelmaboud Azab
    International Orthopaedics, 2018, 42 : 2771 - 2775
  • [38] Skin staples versus intradermal wound closure following primary hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised trial including 231 cases
    Buttaro, Martin A.
    Quinteros, Mauricio
    Martorell, Gabriel
    Zanotti, Gerardo
    Comba, Fernando
    Piccaluga, Francisco
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 25 (06) : 563 - 567
  • [39] Functional outcomes of direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty: Oblique 'bikini' versus longitudinal skin incision
    Menzies-Wilson, Richard
    Marino, Iskandar Tamimi
    Mahalingham, Karuppiah
    Field, Richard
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 27 (01) : 52 - 56
  • [40] Difference in Stem Alignment Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Abe, Hirohito
    Sakai, Takashi
    Takao, Masaki
    Nishii, Takashi
    Nakamura, Nobuo
    Sugano, Nobuhiko
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (10): : 1761 - 1766