Large language models in science

被引:0
|
作者
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich [1 ]
Rodler, Severin [2 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Mannheim, Klin Urol & Urochirurg, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1-3, D-68167 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Klin Urol, Campus Kiel,Arnold Heller Str 3, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
来源
UROLOGIE | 2024年 / 63卷 / 09期
关键词
ChatGPT; Gemini; K & uuml; nstliche Intelligenz; Urologie; Patientendaten; Machine Learning; Artificial intelligence; Urology; Patient data; Machine learning;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-024-02396-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Large language models (LLMs) are gaining popularity due to their ability to communicate in a human-like manner. Their potential for science, including urology, is increasingly recognized. However, unresolved concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the accuracy of LLM results still exist. Research question: This review examines the ethical, technical, and practical challenges as well as the potential applications of LLMs in urology and science. Materials and methodsA selective literature review was conducted to analyze current findings and developments in the field of LLMs. The review considered studies on technical aspects, ethical considerations, and practical applications in research and practice. Results: LLMs, such as GPT from OpenAI and Gemini from Google, show great potential for processing and analyzing text data. Applications in urology include creating patient information and supporting administrative tasks. However, for purely clinical and scientific questions, the methods do not yet seem mature. Currently, concerns about ethical issues and the accuracy of results persist. Conclusion: LLMs have the potential to support research and practice through efficient data processing and information provision. Despite their advantages, ethical concerns and technical challenges must be addressed to ensure responsible and trustworthy use. Increased implementation could reduce the workload of urologists and improve communication with patients.
引用
收藏
页码:860 / 866
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Large Language Models in Computer Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review
    Raihan, Nishat
    Siddiq, Mohammed Latif
    Santos, Joanna C. S.
    Zampieri, Marcos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, SIGCSE TS 2025, VOL 2, 2025, : 938 - 944
  • [22] HoneyBee: Progressive Instruction Finetuning of Large Language Models for Materials Science
    Song, Yu
    Miret, Santiago
    Zhang, Huan
    Liu, Bang
    FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS - EMNLP 2023, 2023, : 5724 - 5739
  • [23] Blurry Authorship: Originality in Science before and after Large Language Models
    Csiszar, Alex
    HISTORICAL STUDIES IN THE NATURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 54 (05) : 611 - 616
  • [24] Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system
    Fecher, Benedikt
    Hebing, Marcel
    Laufer, Melissa
    Pohle, Joerg
    Sofsky, Fabian
    AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 40 (2) : 447 - 459
  • [25] Large Language Models in Computer Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review
    Raihan, Nishat
    Siddiq, Mohammed Latif
    Santos, Joanna C. S.
    Zampieri, Marcos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, SIGCSE TS 2025, VOL 1, 2025, : 938 - 944
  • [26] Large Language Models are Not Models of Natural Language: They are Corpus Models
    Veres, Csaba
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 61970 - 61979
  • [27] Large Language Models
    Vargas, Diego Collarana
    Katsamanis, Nassos
    ERCIM NEWS, 2024, (136): : 12 - 13
  • [28] Large Language Models
    Cerf, Vinton G.
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2023, 66 (08) : 7 - 7
  • [29] Clinical Science and Practice in the Age of Large Language Models and Generative Artificial Intelligence
    Schueller, Stephen M.
    Morris, Robert R.
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 91 (10) : 559 - 561
  • [30] Ten simple rules for using large language models in science, version 1.0
    Smith, Gabriel Reuben
    Bello, Carolina
    Bialic-Murphy, Lalasia
    Clark, Emily
    Delavaux, Camille S.
    de Lauriere, Camille Fournier
    van den Hoogen, Johan
    Lauber, Thomas
    Ma, Haozhi
    Maynard, Daniel S.
    Mirman, Matthew
    Mo, Lidong
    Rebindaine, Dominic
    Reek, Josephine Elena
    Werden, Leland K.
    Wu, Zhaofei
    Yang, Gayoung
    Zhao, Qingzhou
    Zohner, Constantin M.
    Crowther, Thomas W.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2024, 20 (01)