Quality and Safety in Nursing: Recommendations From a Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Patrician, Patricia A. [1 ]
Campbell, Caitlin M. [1 ]
Javed, Mariyam [1 ]
Williams, Kathy M. [2 ]
Foots, Lozay [3 ]
Hamilton, Wendy M. [4 ]
House, Sherita [5 ]
Swiger, Pauline A. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] 96th Med Grp, Eglin AFB, FL USA
[3] Def Hlth Agcy, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Honolulu, HI USA
[5] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC USA
[6] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Ctr Nursing Sci & Clin Inquiry, Washington, DC USA
[7] Army Surg Gen Nursing Res Tacoma, Washington, DC USA
关键词
quality; safety; nursing; systematic review; IMPROVE PATIENT SAFETY; WORK-ENVIRONMENT; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT; DISCHARGE PROCESS; MOBILITY PROGRAM; PRESSURE ULCERS; ADVERSE EVENTS; RAPID-RESPONSE; FEELING SAFE; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000430
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. As a consistent 24-hour presence in hospitals, nurses play a pivotal role in ensuring the quality and safety (Q&S) of patient care. However, a comprehensive review of evidence-based recommendations to guide nursing interventions that enhance the Q&S of patient care is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of our systematic review was to create evidence-based recommendations for the Q&S component of a nursing professional practice model for military hospitals. To accomplish this, a triservice military nursing team used Covidence software to conduct a systematic review of the literature across five databases. Two hundred forty-nine articles met inclusion criteria. From these articles, we created 94 recommendations for practice and identified eight focus areas from the literature: (1) communication; (2) adverse events; (3) leadership; (4) patient experience; (5) quality improvement; (6) safety culture/committees; (7) staffing/workload/work environment; and (8) technology/electronic health record. These findings provide suggestions for implementing Q&S practices that could be adapted to many healthcare delivery systems.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 219
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of Pain Intensity Assessment Reporting: ACTTION Systematic Review and Recommendations
    Smith, Shannon M.
    Hunsinger, Matthew
    McKeown, Andrew
    Parkhurst, Melissa
    Allen, Robert
    Kopko, Stephen
    Lu, Yun
    Wilson, Hilary D.
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Desjardins, Paul
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Rappaport, Bob A.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (04): : 299 - 305
  • [22] Guidelines' recommendations for the treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review of their quality
    Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro
    Stein, Airton Tetelbom
    Melo, Daniela de Oliveira
    Fontes-Mota, Gessica Caroline Henrique
    dos Santos, Itamires Benicio
    Rodrigues, Camila da Silva
    Dourado, Andrea D.
    Rodrigues, Monica Cristiane
    Fraguas, Renerio
    Florez, Ivan
    Correia, Diogo Telles
    Ribeiro, Eliane
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [23] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of psychological intervention nursing on the quality of life of breast cancer patients
    Li, Hanbing
    Li, Junfeng
    Wang, Xiaoqing
    Lin, Shuai
    Yang, Wen
    Cai, Hui
    Feng, Xiaofen
    GLAND SURGERY, 2022, 11 (05) : 882 - 891
  • [24] Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroids in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Systematic Literature Review and Practical Recommendations
    Sanmarti, Raimon
    Tornero Molina, Jesus
    Javier Narvaez, Francisco
    Munoz, Alejandro
    Garmendia, Elena
    Ortiz Garcia, Ana M.
    Abad, Miguel A.
    Moya, Patricia
    Lourdes Mateo, Maria
    Reina, Delia
    Salvatierra Osorio, Juan
    Rodriguez, Sergio
    Rubial Escribano, Ana
    Palmou-Fontana, Natalia
    Calvo-Alen, Jaime
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 70
  • [25] Evaluating How Safety-Net Hospitals Are Identified: Systematic Review and Recommendations
    Powell, W. Ryan
    Hansmann, Kellia J.
    Carlson, Andrew
    Kind, Amy J. H.
    HEALTH EQUITY, 2022, 6 (01) : 298 - 306
  • [26] A systematic review of robot-assisted cholecystectomy to examine the quality of reporting in relation to the IDEAL recommendations: systematic review
    Kirkham, Emily N.
    Jones, Conor S.
    Higginbotham, George
    Biggs, Sarah
    Dewi, Ffion
    Dixon, Lauren
    Huttman, Marc
    Main, Barry G.
    Ramirez, Jozel
    Robertson, Harry
    Scroggie, Darren L.
    Zucker, Benjamin
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Pathak, Sami
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (05):
  • [27] Expert nurse response to workforce recommendations made by The Coronavirus Commission For Safety And Quality In Nursing Homes
    Bakerjian, Deb
    Boltz, Marie
    Bowers, Barbara
    Gray-Miceli, Deanne
    Harrington, Charlene
    Kolanowski, Ann
    Mueller, Christine A.
    NURSING OUTLOOK, 2021, 69 (05) : 735 - 743
  • [28] Peer Review in Nursing Essential Components of a Model Supporting Safety and Quality
    George, Vicki
    Haag-Heitman, Barb
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 45 (7-8): : 398 - 403
  • [29] Quality and Safety in Nursing Education
    Fitzpatrick, Joyce J.
    NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 35 (04) : 211 - 211
  • [30] Transforming Safety and Quality in Nursing
    Altmann, Ana R.
    Becker, Elena Maria
    Granahan, Kristin
    Hlela, Haley B.
    Mariotz, Alyssa
    O'Connor, Theresa A.
    Sermania, Corinne M.
    Shanahan, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2023, 38 (04) : 293 - 296