Explaining the stringency of environmental policies: Domestic determinants or international policy coordination?

被引:2
|
作者
Cadoret, Isabelle [1 ]
Padovano, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, Condorcet Ctr Polit Econ, CNRS, UMR6211,CREM, Rennes, France
[2] Univ Roma Tre, DSP, Rome, Italy
关键词
Environmental policy stringency; Spatial interactions; International policy coordination; Regulatory quality; Decentralization; Voters; Special interest groups; STRATEGIC INTERACTION; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; OECD COUNTRIES; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; EXPENDITURE; CONVERGENCE; ORIENTATION; COMPETITION; CORRUPTION; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102596
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines how and to what extent spatial interactions among EU national governments affect the stringency of environmental policies (EP). We innovate on the literature along three dimensions: 1) we evaluate the spatial interactions across countries to assess the "interaction dividend" associated with international treaties; 2) we better examine how political and institutional variables shape EP when such interactions are taken into account; 3) we identify the type of EP for which these interactions play a more relevant role by considering for the first time the new EPS21 disaggregated indexes of policy stringency. In a sample of 21 European countries between 2000 and 2018, a benchmark model shows that, among country-specific effects, proxies for the industries' lobbying power, quality of governance, government's ideology, decentralization and the urbanization rate of voters play important roles. When the model consider spatial interactions among countries, the estimates reveal that between 1/3 and more than one-half of a country's commitment to EP can be attributed to positive spillover effects from other countries, depending on the type of policy, with more prominent effects in technology support policies. These results reinforce the need of supranational coordination through international organizations and treaties.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public opinion, elections, and environmental policy stringency in the European Union
    Chortareas, Georgios
    Logothetis, Vasileios
    Papandreou, Andreas A.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2025,
  • [42] Effects of geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability and the moderating role of environmental policy stringency
    Luo, Heng
    Sun, Ying
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [43] Analyzing the role of environmental technologies and environmental policy stringency on green growth in China
    Chen, Li
    Tanchangya, Papel
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (37) : 55630 - 55638
  • [44] How does environmental policy stringency influence green innovation for environmental managements?
    Xie, Peijun
    Xu, Yong
    Tan, Xue
    Tan, Qianqian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 338
  • [45] Achieving energy resilience: The joint role of environmental policy stringency and environmental awareness
    Dabbous, Amal
    Croutzet, Alexandre
    Horn, Matthias
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2025, 74
  • [46] Determinants and welfare of the environmental regulatory stringency before and after regulatory capture
    Lei, Ping
    Huang, Qi
    He, Dayi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 107 - 113
  • [47] Climate Change and Economic Growth: The Role of Environmental Policy Stringency
    de Angelis, Enrico Maria
    Di Giacomo, Marina
    Vannoni, Davide
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):
  • [48] Revealing the effectiveness of environmental policy stringency and environmental law on environmental performance: does asymmetry matter?
    Chen, Mingxiang
    Sohail, Sidra
    Majeed, Muhammad Tariq
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (60) : 91190 - 91200
  • [49] Domestic sources of international environmental policy: industry, environmentalists, and US power.
    Falkner, R
    INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2001, 77 (02) : 444 - 446
  • [50] Domestic sources of international environmental policy: Industry, environmentalists, and US power.
    Mitchell, RB
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (02) : 514 - 515