Physics-Informed Machine Learning Using Low-Fidelity Flowfields for Inverse Airfoil Shape Design

被引:1
|
作者
Wong, Benjamin Y. J. [1 ]
Damodaran, Murali [2 ]
Khoo, Boo Cheong [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn, Singapore 117411, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore 117411, Singapore
关键词
Machine Learning; Airfoil Databases; Artificial Neural Network; Aerodynamic Analysis; Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes; Computational Fluid Dynamics; Aircraft Design; Applied Mathematics; Computational Physics; Wing-Shape Optimization; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; IMPEDANCE; CHANNEL; FLOW;
D O I
10.2514/1.J063570
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are a class of scientific machine learning that utilizes differential equations in loss formulations to model physical quantities. Despite recent developments, complex phenomena such as high-Reynolds-number (high-Re) flow remain a modeling challenge without the use of high-fidelity inputs. In this study, a low-fidelity-influenced physics-informed neural network (LF-PINN) is proposed as a surrogate aerodynamic analysis model for inverse airfoil shape design at Re=1.0x106. The LF-PINN is developed in a hybrid approach using low-fidelity flowfields approximated from a viscous-inviscid coupled airfoil analysis tool (mfoil) and physics residuals from the steady, incompressible, two-dimensional Navier-Stokes (NS) equations. The approach is designed to alleviate offline computational costs by avoiding high-fidelity simulations and sustain predicting accuracy using corrections by the physics residuals. The LF-PINN is able to correct the low-fidelity flowfield quantities toward the ground truth, with a mean improvement of about 19% in pressure and about 5% in total velocity based on Euclidean distance comparisons. Evaluation of the airfoil surface pressure coefficient Cp distributions shows corrections by the LF-PINN at the suction peak, which largely contributes to lifting forces. Inverse airfoil shape design is conducted using target Cp distributions in the objective function, whereby the LF-PINN can approach the expected target shapes while reducing online computational time by at least an order of magnitude compared to direct airfoil analysis tools.
引用
收藏
页码:2846 / 2861
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neural Oscillators for Generalization of Physics-Informed Machine Learning
    Kapoor, Taniya
    Chandra, Abhishek
    Tartakovsky, Daniel M.
    Wang, Hongrui
    Nunez, Alfredo
    Dollevoet, Rolf
    THIRTY-EIGHTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 38 NO 12, 2024, : 13059 - 13067
  • [22] Physics-informed machine learning for programmable photonic circuits
    Teofilovic, Isidora
    Zibar, Darko
    Da Ros, Francesco
    MACHINE LEARNING IN PHOTONICS, 2024, 13017
  • [23] Physics-informed machine learning for moving load problems
    Kapoor, Taniya
    Wang, Hongrui
    Nunez, Alfredo
    Dollevoet, Rolf
    XII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, EURODYN 2023, 2024, 2647
  • [24] Probabilistic physics-informed machine learning for dynamic systems
    Subramanian, Abhinav
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 230
  • [25] Physics-Informed Extreme Learning Machine Lyapunov Functions
    Zhou, Ruikun
    Fitzsimmons, Maxwell
    Meng, Yiming
    Liu, Jun
    IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS LETTERS, 2024, 8 : 1763 - 1768
  • [26] Predicting glass structure by physics-informed machine learning
    Bodker, Mikkel L.
    Bauchy, Mathieu
    Du, Tao
    Mauro, John C.
    Smedskjaer, Morten M.
    NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [27] Parsimony as the ultimate regularizer for physics-informed machine learning
    J. Nathan Kutz
    Steven L. Brunton
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2022, 107 : 1801 - 1817
  • [28] Parsimony as the ultimate regularizer for physics-informed machine learning
    Kutz, J. Nathan
    Brunton, Steven L.
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2022, 107 (03) : 1801 - 1817
  • [29] Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Optical Modes in Composites
    Ghosh, Abantika
    Elhamod, Mohannad
    Bu, Jie
    Lee, Wei-Cheng
    Karpatne, Anuj
    Podolskiy, Viktor A.
    ADVANCED PHOTONICS RESEARCH, 2022, 3 (11):
  • [30] Predicting glass structure by physics-informed machine learning
    Mikkel L. Bødker
    Mathieu Bauchy
    Tao Du
    John C. Mauro
    Morten M. Smedskjaer
    npj Computational Materials, 8