Muscle-to-Bone Ratio in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Players by Position

被引:1
|
作者
Dengel, Donald R. [1 ]
Studee, Hannah R. [1 ]
Juckett, William T. [1 ]
Bosch, Tyler A. [2 ]
Carbuhn, Aaron F. [3 ]
Stanforth, Philip R. [4 ]
Evanoff, Nicholas G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Kinesiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Athlete Performance Ctr, Red Bull Performance & Data Analyt, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Dietet & Nutr, Kansas City, KS USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Educ, Austin, TX USA
关键词
dual x-ray absorptiometry; body composition; athletics; percent fat; BODY-COMPOSITION; PROFILE; MASS; DXA;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000004853
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Dengel, DR, Studee, HR, Juckett, WT, Bosch, TA, Carbuhn, AF, Stanforth, PR, and Evanoff, NG. Muscle-to-bone ratio in NCAA Division I collegiate football players by position. J Strength Cond Res 38(9): 1607-1612, 2024-The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle-to-bone ratio (MBR) in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football players (collegiate football players [CFP]) to healthy, age-matched controls. In addition, we examined MBR in CFP by position. A total of 553 CFP and 261 controls had their total and regional lean mass (LM), fat mass (FM), and bone mineral content (BMC) determined by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). College football players were categorized by positions defined as offensive linemen (OL), defensive linemen (DL), tight end, linebacker (LB), running back (RB), punter or kicker, quarterback (QB), defensive back (DB), and wide receiver (WR). There were significant differences between CFP and controls for total LM (80.1 +/- 10.0 vs. 56.9 +/- 7.8 kg), FM (22.2 +/- 12.5 vs. 15.2 +/- 7.1 kg), and BMC (4.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.5 kg). Although there were significant differences in body composition between CFP and controls, there was no significant differences in total MBR between CFP and controls (18.6 +/- 1.4 vs. 18.8 +/- 1.7). Regionally, CFP had significantly lower trunk MBR than controls (26.7 +/- 2.7 vs. 28.7 +/- 4.2), but no difference was seen in leg or arm MBR. Positional differences in CFP were noted as total MBR being significantly higher in DL (19.0 +/- 1.4) than in DB (18.1 +/- 1.3), WR (18.1 +/- 1.3), and LB (18.2 +/- 1.3). OL had a significantly higher total MBR (19.2 +/- 1.3) than DB (18.1 +/- 1.3), LB (18.2 +/- 1.3), QB (18.1 +/- 1.0), and WR (18.1 +/- 1.3). In addition, RB had significantly higher total MBR (18.8 +/- 1.3) than DB (18.1 +/- 1.3) and WR (18.1 +/- 1.3). This study may provide athletes and training staff with normative values when evaluating total and regional MBR with DXA.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1612
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Intersection Of Sleep And Head Impacts In Division I Collegiate Football Players: A Pilot Study
    Wilkes, James R.
    Walter, Alexa
    Shetty, Samidha
    Niu, Xiaoyue Maggie
    Chang, Anne-Marie
    Miller, Sayers John
    Sebastianelli, Wayne J.
    Seidenberg, Peter H.
    Slobounov, Semyon
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2024, 56 (10) : 186 - 186
  • [42] Relationships Of Lower Body Power And Strength For NCAA Division I Men's Collegiate Basketball Players
    Lane, Mike
    Fry, Andy C.
    Gallagher, Phil M.
    Vardiman, J. P.
    Hudy, Andrea
    Graham, Z. A.
    McCartney, M. K.
    Andre, M. J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : 398 - 398
  • [43] Relationships Of Lower Body Power And Strength For NCAA Division I Men's Collegiate Basketball Players
    Lane, Mike
    Fry, Andy C.
    Gallagher, Phil M.
    Vardiman, J. P.
    Hudy, Andrea
    Graham, Z. A.
    McCartney, M. K.
    Andre, M. J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2011, 43 (05): : 398 - 398
  • [44] Hip adduction and abduction strength values in NCAA Division I American football players: Strength values and a comparison across position groups
    Connor, Ciaran O'
    Renaghan, Eric
    Bennett, Adam
    Ferrer, Luis
    Damodaran, Raina
    Geraghty, Patrick
    Feigenbaum, Luis A.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2025, 72 : 32 - 38
  • [45] Strength and physiological characteristics of NCAA Division III American football players
    Schmidt, WD
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 1999, 13 (03) : 210 - 213
  • [46] Nutrition practices and knowledge among NCAA Division III football players
    Abbey, Elizabeth Lea
    Wright, Cynthia Joy
    Kirkpatrick, Christina M.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SPORTS NUTRITION, 2017, 14
  • [47] THE CURRENT STATE OF NCAA DIVISION I COLLEGIATE STRENGTH FACILITIES: SIZE, EQUIPMENT, BUDGET, STAFFING, AND FOOTBALL STATUS
    Judge, Lawrence W.
    Petersen, Jeffrey C.
    Bellar, David M.
    Craig, Bruce W.
    Cottingham, Michael P.
    Gilreath, Erin L.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (08) : 2253 - 2261
  • [48] The Role of Speed, Change of Direction, and Momentum by Position and Starting Status in Division 1 Collegiate Football Players
    Mann, J. Bryan
    Cowley, Nicholas
    Weakley, Jonathon
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2025, 39 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [49] An Analysis of Sports Specialization in NCAA Division I Collegiate Athletics
    Swindell, Hasani W.
    Marcille, Melanie L.
    Trofa, David P.
    Paulino, Franklin E.
    Desai, Natasha N.
    Lynch, Thomas Sean
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    Popkin, Charles A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [50] The Prevalence of Asthma in an NCAA Division I Collegiate Athletic Program
    Zoz, Donald F.
    Parsons, Jonathan P.
    Oman, Janine L.
    Phillips, Gary
    Kaeding, Christopher C.
    Best, Thomas M.
    Mastronarde, John G.
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2008, 45 (09) : 845 - 848