Muscle-to-Bone Ratio in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Players by Position

被引:1
|
作者
Dengel, Donald R. [1 ]
Studee, Hannah R. [1 ]
Juckett, William T. [1 ]
Bosch, Tyler A. [2 ]
Carbuhn, Aaron F. [3 ]
Stanforth, Philip R. [4 ]
Evanoff, Nicholas G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Kinesiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Athlete Performance Ctr, Red Bull Performance & Data Analyt, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Dietet & Nutr, Kansas City, KS USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Educ, Austin, TX USA
关键词
dual x-ray absorptiometry; body composition; athletics; percent fat; BODY-COMPOSITION; PROFILE; MASS; DXA;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0000000000004853
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Dengel, DR, Studee, HR, Juckett, WT, Bosch, TA, Carbuhn, AF, Stanforth, PR, and Evanoff, NG. Muscle-to-bone ratio in NCAA Division I collegiate football players by position. J Strength Cond Res 38(9): 1607-1612, 2024-The purpose of this study was to compare the muscle-to-bone ratio (MBR) in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football players (collegiate football players [CFP]) to healthy, age-matched controls. In addition, we examined MBR in CFP by position. A total of 553 CFP and 261 controls had their total and regional lean mass (LM), fat mass (FM), and bone mineral content (BMC) determined by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). College football players were categorized by positions defined as offensive linemen (OL), defensive linemen (DL), tight end, linebacker (LB), running back (RB), punter or kicker, quarterback (QB), defensive back (DB), and wide receiver (WR). There were significant differences between CFP and controls for total LM (80.1 +/- 10.0 vs. 56.9 +/- 7.8 kg), FM (22.2 +/- 12.5 vs. 15.2 +/- 7.1 kg), and BMC (4.3 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.5 kg). Although there were significant differences in body composition between CFP and controls, there was no significant differences in total MBR between CFP and controls (18.6 +/- 1.4 vs. 18.8 +/- 1.7). Regionally, CFP had significantly lower trunk MBR than controls (26.7 +/- 2.7 vs. 28.7 +/- 4.2), but no difference was seen in leg or arm MBR. Positional differences in CFP were noted as total MBR being significantly higher in DL (19.0 +/- 1.4) than in DB (18.1 +/- 1.3), WR (18.1 +/- 1.3), and LB (18.2 +/- 1.3). OL had a significantly higher total MBR (19.2 +/- 1.3) than DB (18.1 +/- 1.3), LB (18.2 +/- 1.3), QB (18.1 +/- 1.0), and WR (18.1 +/- 1.3). In addition, RB had significantly higher total MBR (18.8 +/- 1.3) than DB (18.1 +/- 1.3) and WR (18.1 +/- 1.3). This study may provide athletes and training staff with normative values when evaluating total and regional MBR with DXA.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1612
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Muscle-to-bone Ratio In Division I Collegiate Football Players By Position
    Studee, Hannah R.
    Bosch, Tyler A.
    Carbuhn, Aaron F.
    Stanforth, Philip R.
    Czeck, Madeline A.
    Evanoff, Nicholas G.
    Dengel, Donald R.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2023, 55 (09) : 713 - 713
  • [2] Frequency of Head-Impact-Related Outcomes by Position in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Players
    Baugh, Christine M.
    Kiernan, Patrick T.
    Kroshus, Emily
    Daneshvar, Daniel H.
    Montenigro, Philip H.
    McKee, Ann C.
    Stern, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2015, 32 (05) : 314 - 326
  • [3] Positional Differences in Muscle-to-bone Ratio in National Football League Players
    Dengel, Donald R.
    Evanoff, Nicholas G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 44 (10) : 720 - 727
  • [4] MUSCLE CHARACTERISTICS AND BODY COMPOSITION OF NCAA DIVISION I FOOTBALL PLAYERS
    Melvin, Malia N.
    Smith-Ryan, Abbie E.
    Wingfield, Hailee L.
    Ryan, Eric D.
    Trexler, Eric T.
    Roelofs, Erica J.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (12) : 3320 - 3329
  • [5] Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density of NCAA Division I Football Players
    Bosch, Tyler A.
    Carbuhn, Aaron
    Stanforth, Philip R.
    Oliver, Jonathan M.
    Keller, Kathryn A.
    Dengel, Donald R.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (05): : 174 - 175
  • [6] Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density of NCAA Division I Football Players
    Bosch, Tyler A.
    Carbuhn, Aaron
    Stanforth, Philip R.
    Oliver, Jonathan M.
    Keller, Kathryn A.
    Dengel, Donald R.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2017, 49 (05): : 174 - 175
  • [7] FAT-FREE MASS INDEX IN NCAA DIVISION I AND II COLLEGIATE AMERICAN FOOTBALL PLAYERS
    Trexler, Eric T.
    Smith-Ryan, Abbie E.
    Blue, Malia N. M.
    Schumacher, Richard M.
    Mayhew, Jerry L.
    Mann, J. Bryan
    Ivey, Pat A.
    Hirsch, Katie R.
    Mock, Meredith G.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2017, 31 (10) : 2719 - 2727
  • [8] Analysis of BMI by Position of NCAA Division I Football
    Vlahov, Eric
    Andersen, Jody C.
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2017, 88 : A21 - A22
  • [9] Relationship Between Position, Cumulative Impacts And Cumulative Accelerations In Ncaa Division I Football Players
    Grimes, Katelyn E.
    Shiflett, Eric D.
    Munkasy, Barry A.
    Ake, Klarie M.
    D'Amico, Nathan R.
    Mormile, Megan E.
    Powell, Douglas W.
    Buckley, Thomas A.
    Murray, Nicholas G.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 530 - 531
  • [10] The Influence of Playing Experience and Position on Injury Risk in NCAA Division I College Football Players
    McCunn, Robert
    Fullagar, Hugh H. K.
    Williams, Sean
    Halseth, Travis J.
    Sampson, John A.
    Murray, Andrew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 12 (10) : 1297 - 1304