Structure-property modeling of pharmacokinetic characteristics of anticancer drugs via topological indices, multigraph modeling and multi-criteria decision making

被引:2
|
作者
Pandi, Ugasini Preetha [1 ]
Hayat, Sakander [2 ]
Marimuthu, Suresh [1 ]
Konsalraj, Julietraja [3 ]
机构
[1] SRM Inst Sci & Technol, Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Math, Kattankulathur, India
[2] Univ Brunei Darussalam, Fac Sci, Dept Math, Jln Tungku Link, BE-1410 Gadong, Brunei
[3] Presidency Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Math, Bengaluru, India
关键词
ADME; anticancer drugs; MCDM; structure-property modeling; weight allocation; VE-DEGREE;
D O I
10.1002/qua.27428
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study presents an in-depth inquiry into estimating ADME properties for promising anticancer drugs, particularly amino acid-based alkylating agents, through ev-ve degree topological indices and QSPR analysis. The aim of the study is to compare multigraph modeling to simple graph modeling in estimating six ADME properties. Results demonstrate that multigraph modeling's superior performance, with notable high correlations such as r=0.926$$ r=0.926 $$ for maximum passive absorption (MPA) using the M-ev index, compared to simple graph modeling's r=0.68$$ r=0.68 $$ with the M2$$ {M}_2 $$-ev index. This emphasizes the need for sophisticated modeling techniques in drug development. The primary objective is to compare multigraph and simple graph modeling using topological structure descriptors, followed by QSPR analysis to determine the better approach in estimating ADME properties. MCDM weight allocation techniques validate correlation values, enhancing understanding of estimators and identifying potential drugs. This underscores the importance of considering various MCDM methods and weight allocation approaches for reliable decision-making in healthcare contexts. In the realm of graph theory, the comparison between multigraphs and simple graphs revealed that in estimating physicochemical properties of drug structures using topological indices, multigraphs demonstrated a marginal but noteworthy superiority. Here one of the ADME property maximum passive absorption (MPA) of multigraph model shows a stronger positive correlation relationship, r=0.926$$ r=0.926 $$ with the amino acid based anticancer drugs compared to the simple graph model with r=0.68$$ r=0.68 $$. This perspective shows that using multigraphs in graph theory has small but important benefits for understanding and estimating properties in complex structures like drugs. image
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Integrated Multi-Criteria Modeling and 3D Visualization for Informed Trade-Off Decision Making on Urban Development Options
    Neuenschwander, Noemi
    Hayek, Ulrike Wissen
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECAADE 2012, VOL 1: DIGITAL PHYSICALITY, 2012, : 203 - 211
  • [32] Modeling the Impact of Interaction Factors for Transport System Elements on Quality of Life Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Applied Statistical Methods
    Sivilevicius, Henrikas
    Zuraulis, Vidas
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [33] SM-BIM: A NEW CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PROCESS BASED ON SMART MATERIALS AND BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING
    Mohamed, Menna-Allah T.
    Megahed, Naglaa A.
    Eltarabily, Sara
    Shahda, Merhan M.
    JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2024, 19 (02): : 163 - 191
  • [34] Modeling cause-and-effect relationships among predictive variables of human error based on the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method
    Soltanzadeh, Ahmad
    Sadeghi Yarandi, Mohsen
    Mirzaei Aliabadi, Mostafa
    Mahdinia, Mohsen
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2022, 23 (03) : 259 - 276
  • [35] Flood-based critical sub-watershed mapping: comparative application of multi-criteria decision making methods and hydrological modeling approach
    Ali Nasiri Khiavi
    Mehdi Vafakhah
    Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2023, 37 : 2757 - 2775
  • [36] Flood-based critical sub-watershed mapping: comparative application of multi-criteria decision making methods and hydrological modeling approach
    Khiavi, Ali Nasiri
    Vafakhah, Mehdi
    Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (07) : 2757 - 2775
  • [37] Offshore wind turbine selection with multi-criteria decision-making techniques involving D numbers and squeeze adversarial interpretive structural modeling method
    Li, Xia
    Xu, Li
    Cai, Jingjing
    Peng, Cheng
    Bian, Xiaoyan
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 368
  • [38] Mapping Risk to Land Subsidence: Developing a Two-Level Modeling Strategy by Combining Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Artificial Intelligence Techniques
    Nadiri, Ata Allah
    Moazamnia, Marjan
    Sadeghfam, Sina
    Barzegar, Rahim
    WATER, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [39] Phase-wise injury integrated severity modeling of road accidents: a two-stage hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model
    Trivedi, Priyank
    Shah, Jiten
    Esztergar-Kiss, Domokos
    Duleba, Szabolcs
    EVOLVING SYSTEMS, 2024, 15 (04) : 1275 - 1295
  • [40] AN IMPROVED TOTAL INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING INDICATOR SYSTEMS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS: THE CASE OF SHIP DESIGN EVALUATION AND SELECTION
    Chen, Cheng
    Zhang, Xiangrui
    Zhang, Pei
    Feng, Feng
    Sun, Cong
    Zhang, Xiuyuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 42ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2023, VOL 5, 2023,