Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review

被引:0
|
作者
Gomez-Molina, Raquel [1 ]
Suarez, Miguel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Martinez, Raquel [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chilet, Marifina [1 ]
Bauca, Josep Miquel [5 ]
Mateo, Jorge [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Virgen Luz Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Cuenca 16002, Spain
[2] Virgen Luz Hosp, Gastroenterol Dept, Cuenca 16002, Spain
[3] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Inst Technol, Med Anal Expert Grp, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[4] Inst Invest Sanitaria Castilla La Mancha IDISCAM, Med Anal Expert Grp, Toledo 45071, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Son Espases, Dept Lab Med, Palma De Mallorca 07120, Spain
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; cancer early detection; fecal occult blood test; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS; OCCULT BLOOD-TESTS; ADVANCED ADENOMA DETECTION; DNA TEST; COLONOSCOPY; PREVENTION; GUIDELINE; DIAGNOSIS; ASPIRIN; NUMBER;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12161645
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health issue where early detection is crucial for improving treatment outcomes and survival rates. This comprehensive review assesses the utility of stool-based tests in CRC screening, including traditional fecal occult blood tests (FOBT), both chemical (gFOBT) and immunochemical techniques (FIT), as well as multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) as a novel and promising biomarker. The advancements, limitations and the impact of false positives and negatives of these methods are examined. The review analyzed various studies on current screening methods, focusing on laboratory tests and biomarkers. Findings indicate that while FIT and mt-sDNA tests offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity over traditional guaiac-based FOBT, they also come with higher costs and potential for increased false positives. FIT shows better patient adherence due to its ease to use, but incorrect usage and interpretation of FOBT can lead to significant diagnostic errors. In conclusion, despite the improvements in FOBT methods like FIT in CRC detection, careful consideration of each method's benefits and drawbacks is essential. Effective CRC screening programs should combine various methods tailored to specific population needs, aiming for early detection and reduced mortality rates.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Colonoscopy and stool-based DNA testing preferred for routine colorectal cancer screening (CRCS)
    Lal, S
    Zamor, P
    Glick, J
    Heeren, T
    Schroy, PC
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A346 - A346
  • [42] YAdenoma Detection Rate After Positive Stool-Based Screening and Risk of Interval Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer
    Delungahawatta, Thilini
    Hum, Richard
    Woo, Stephanie M.
    Loughney, Thomas
    Jennings, Joseph
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S526 - S527
  • [43] Fecal Immunochemical Tests Combined With Other Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review
    Niedermaier, Tobias
    Weigl, Korbinian
    Hoffmeister, Michael
    Brenner, Hermann
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [44] Critical Adherence to Blood-Based vs Stool-Based Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Scenario Analysis
    Meester, Reinier
    Piscitello, Andrew
    Baldo, Lance
    Liang, Peter S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S254 - S255
  • [45] Projected Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Based on Observed Adherence to Colonoscopy and Sequential Stool-Based Screening
    Meester, Reinier G. S.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Winawer, Sidney J.
    Church, Timothy R.
    Allen, John I.
    Feld, Andrew D.
    Mills, Glenn
    Jordan, Paul A.
    Corley, Douglas A.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Hahn, Anne I.
    Lobaugh, Stephanie M.
    Fleisher, Martin
    O'Brien, Michael J.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (07): : 1392 - 1401
  • [46] Guidance for setting international standards on reporting longitudinal adherence to stool-based colorectal cancer screening
    van Wifferen, Francine
    Greuter, Marjolein J. E.
    Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit, I
    Carvalho, Beatriz
    Meijer, Gerrit A.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Campari, Cinzia
    Garcia, Montse
    Rabeneck, Linda
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Senore, Carlo
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 164
  • [47] Assessing the effects of pharmacist education on colorectal cancer screening and access to a stool-based DNA test
    Moore, Madysen S.
    Ruisinger, Janelle F.
    Johnson, Lesley M.
    Melton, Brittany L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2023, 63 (04) : S14 - S19
  • [48] Cost-Effectiveness of Outreach Strategies for Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Medicaid Population
    Karlitz, Jordan J.
    Fendrick, A. Mark
    Bhatt, Jay
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Jeyakumar, Sushanth
    Smith, Nathaniel J.
    Plescia, Marcus
    Brooks, Durado
    Limburg, Paul
    Lieberman, David
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2022, 25 (03) : 343 - 351
  • [49] Changes in uptake of stool-based colorectal cancer screening during the Covid-19 pandemic
    Eric A. Miller
    Paul F. Pinsky
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2023, 34 : 887 - 895
  • [50] Clinical and Budget Impact of Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening by Blood- and Stool-Based Testing
    Roth, Joshua A.
    deVos, Theo
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2019, 12 (05): : 256 - 262