Pilot Process Evaluation of the Supporting Older Adults at Risk Model: A RE-AIM Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Trotta, Rebecca L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shoemaker, Anne E. [4 ]
Greysen, S. Ryan [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Boltz, Marie [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Nursing Res & Innovat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Geriatr Programming, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Hosp Univ Penn, Geriatr Nursing, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Sect Hosp Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Univ Penn, Ctr Evidence Based Practice CEP, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Univ Penn, Div Gen Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[8] Penn State Univ PSU, Nese Coll Nursing, University Pk, PA USA
[9] Penn State Clin & Translat Sci Inst CTSI, KL2 Program Penn State, University Pk, PA USA
关键词
care transitions; geriatrics; care delivery innovation; nursing; CARE TRANSITIONS INTERVENTION; DISCHARGE; IMPLEMENTATION; MEDICATIONS;
D O I
10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000435
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite evidence supporting transitional care models, hospitals report challenges implementing and sustaining them. The Discharge to Assess (D2A) Model is an innovative solution to this problem but required translation from a national health system context to an U.S.-based context. We translated the central tenets of the D2A model to establish the Supporting Older Adults at Risk (SOAR) Model, which unfolds in three phases: Prepare, Transition, and Support. The purpose of this project was to conduct a process evaluation of the SOAR Model in practice using the RE-AIM Framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance). Forty patients completed all SOAR Model components for a Reach of 21%. Patients averaged 80 years of age, 53% were female, and 64% Black/AA. SOAR significantly improved discharge before noon, time to first home visit, and use of the in-house pharmacy. SOAR also improved length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, and readmissions. Twenty-one of the 26 Implementation measures unfolded with 75% or greater fidelity. Sixteen of the 24 Adoption measures unfolded with 75% or greater fidelity. COVID-19 limited Maintenance. Given the model unfolds across settings over time, requiring adoption from interprofessional team members, patients, and families, future work should focus on improving reach and adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:e26 / e39
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of a health system's implementation of a monkeypox care model under the RE-AIM framework
    Polk, Christopher
    Sampson, Mindy
    Fairman, Robert T.
    DeWitt, Michael E.
    Leonard, Michael
    Neelakanta, Anupama
    Davidson, Lisa
    Roshdy, Danya
    Branner, Chris
    McCurdy, Lewis
    Ludden, Tom
    Tapp, Hazel
    Passaretti, Catherine
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2023, 10
  • [22] Program evaluation of the Opioid and Naloxone Education (ONE Rx) program using the RE-AIM model
    Strand, Mark A.
    Eukel, Heidi
    Frenzel, Oliver
    Skoy, Elizabeth
    Steig, Jayme
    Werremeyer, Amy
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2020, 16 (09): : 1248 - 1254
  • [23] A RE-AIM Evaluation of Theory-Based Physical Activity Interventions
    Antikainen, Iina
    Ellis, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 33 (02): : 198 - 214
  • [24] Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Collaborative Care Implementation Using RE-AIM
    Kwan, Bethany M.
    Chadha, Sanjay
    Hamer, Mika K.
    Spagnolo, David
    Kee, Sheila
    FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, 2017, 35 (03) : 295 - 307
  • [25] Evaluation of a workplace intervention to promote commuter cycling: A RE-AIM analysis
    Veerle Dubuy
    Katrien De Cocker
    Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
    Lea Maes
    Jan Seghers
    Johan Lefevre
    Kristine De Martelaer
    Greet Cardon
    BMC Public Health, 13
  • [26] Implementing Teledermatology for Rural Veterans: An Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework
    Peracca, Sara B.
    Jackson, George L.
    Lamkin, Rebecca P.
    Mohr, David C.
    Zhao, Molly
    Lachica, Olevie
    Prentice, Julia C.
    Grenga, Andrea M.
    Gifford, Allen
    Chapman, Jennifer G.
    Weinstock, Martin A.
    Oh, Dennis H.
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2021, 27 (02) : 218 - 226
  • [27] Evaluation of a workplace intervention to promote commuter cycling: A RE-AIM analysis
    Dubuy, Veerle
    De Cocker, Katrien
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    Maes, Lea
    Seghers, Jan
    Lefevre, Johan
    De Martelaer, Kristine
    Cardon, Greet
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [28] RE-AIM Evaluation Plan for Washington State Innovation Models Project
    Grembowski, David
    Conrad, Douglas A.
    Naranjo, Diana
    Wood, Suzanne
    Coe, Norma B.
    Kwan-Gett, Tao
    Baseman, Janet
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 29 (02) : 81 - 94
  • [29] A RE-AIM Evaluation of Theory-Based Physical Activity Interventions
    Antikainen, Iina E.
    Ellis, Rebecca
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2011, 82 (01) : A62 - A62
  • [30] Beyond Evaluation: Using the RE-AIM Framework for Program Planning in Extension
    Balis, Laura E.
    John, Deborah H.
    Harden, Samantha M.
    JOURNAL OF EXTENSION, 2019, 57 (02):