Reducing energy and carbon footprint through diversified rainfed cropping systems

被引:3
|
作者
Kantwa, Sita Ram [1 ]
Choudhary, Mukesh [1 ]
Agrawal, Rajiv Kumar [1 ]
Dixit, Anoop Kumar [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [2 ]
Chary, G. Ravindra [3 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Grassland & Fodder Res Inst, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] ICAR Indian Inst Farming Syst Res, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] ICAR Cent Res Inst Dryland Agr, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
Carbon footprint; Crop diversification; Cropping system; Energy budgeting; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE; MITIGATION; STRATEGIES; ROTATION; FORAGE; CROPS; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100306
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Agriculture is the second largest contributor (20 %) to total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the world. There is a need to identify energy and carbon efficient cropping systems that reduce GHG emission and improve environmental quality. Using life cycle assessment (LCA), we evaluated the four cropping systems namely fallow - chickpea (F-C); Sesbania - mustard (Ses-M); blackgram - chickpea (B-C); sorghum + cowpea - mustard (S + C-M) cultivated during the 2018-2022 period. The energy use pattern and the input-output relationship were analysed. Three measures were utilized to quantify carbon footprints: CFa, which denotes emissions per unit area; CFb, indicating emissions per kilogram of yield; and CFe, representing emissions per unit of economic output. The result indicates that non-renewable sources of energy (diesel and fertilizer) contributed more than similar to 80 % of the total energy consumed in the different cropping systems. The total energy requirement was the highest for S + C-M (16,972 MJ ha(-1)), followed by Ses-M (14,365 MJ ha(-1)), B-C (11,132 MJ ha(-1)) and F-C (8679 MJ ha(-1)) cropping systems. The S + C-M cropping system also had the highest energy use efficiency (9.13) followed by F-C (6.03), B-C (5.41) and Ses-M (5.41). The fallow-chickpea cropping system had the lowest values of CFa, CFb, and CFe however, the highest carbon efficiency (10.7) and the carbon sustainability index (9.7) were computed in S + C-M cropping system. Our findings indicate that thoughtfully structured, varied crop systems that integrate legumes and forage crops have the potential to significantly reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions, while sustaining or potentially improving overall productivity within these systems.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reducing carbon footprint without compromising grain security through relaxing cropping rotation system in the North China Plain
    Zhao, Yingxing
    Wang, Lin
    Lei, Xinyu
    Wang, Biao
    Cui, Jixiao
    Xu, Yinan
    Chen, Yuanquan
    Sui, Peng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 318
  • [22] Opportunities for enhancing yield and soil carbon sequestration while reducing N2O emissions in rainfed cropping systems
    Luo, Zhongkui
    Wang, Enli
    Xing, Hongtao
    Smith, Chris
    Wang, Guocheng
    Cresswell, Hamish
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2017, 232 : 400 - 410
  • [23] Comparison of carbon footprint of traditional agroforestry systems under rainfed and irrigated ecosystems
    Doddabasawa
    Chittapur, B. M.
    Murthy, M. Mahadeva
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2020, 94 (02) : 465 - 475
  • [24] Comparison of carbon footprint of traditional agroforestry systems under rainfed and irrigated ecosystems
    B. M. Doddabasawa
    M. Chittapur
    Agroforestry Systems, 2020, 94 : 465 - 475
  • [25] Diversified cropping systems support greater microbial cycling and retention of carbon and nitrogen
    King, Alison E.
    Hofmockel, Kirsten S.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 240 : 66 - 76
  • [26] Reducing America's carbon footprint through nuclear energy: Assessment of safety and measured criteria
    Sanders, Mark
    Sanders, Charlotta
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255
  • [27] Reducing CO2 footprint through synergies in carbon free energy vectors and low carbon fuels
    Wang, W.
    Herreros, J. M.
    Tsolakis, A.
    York, A. P. E.
    ENERGY, 2016, 112 : 976 - 983
  • [28] Stenotrophomonas in diversified cropping systems: friend or foe?
    Kumar, Abhishek
    Rithesh, Lellapalli
    Kumar, Vikash
    Raghuvanshi, Nikhil
    Chaudhary, Kautilya
    Abhineet
    Pandey, Abhay K.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [29] IMPROVED CROPPING SYSTEMS FOR RAINFED AGRICULTURE IN INDIA
    SPRATT, ED
    CHOWDHURY, SL
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1978, 1 (02) : 103 - 126
  • [30] Rethinking environmental sustainability in rainfed cropping systems
    Sevenster, Maartje
    Kirkegaard, John A.
    Lilley, Julianne M.
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 50 : 128 - 138