Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Giri, Suprabhat [1 ]
Harindranath, Sidharth [2 ,3 ]
Mohan, Babu P. [4 ]
Jearth, Vaneet [5 ]
Varghese, Jijo [6 ]
Kozyk, Marko [7 ]
Kale, Aditya [8 ,9 ]
Sundaram, Sridhar [9 ]
机构
[1] Kalinga Inst Med Sci, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Bhubaneswar, India
[2] Seth GS Med Coll, Dept Gastroenterol, Mumbai, India
[3] King Edward Mem Hosp, Bombay, India
[4] Orlando Gastroenterol, Orlando, FL USA
[5] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Gastroenterol, Chandigarh, India
[6] NS Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Kollam, India
[7] Corewell Hlth William Beaumont Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Royal Oak, MI USA
[8] Adv Ctr Treatment, Dept Digest Dis & Clin Nutr, Res & Educ Canc, Mumbai, India
[9] Tata Mem Hosp, Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Dept Digest Dis & Clin Nutr, Dr E Borges Rd, Mumbai 400012, India
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; gastric outlet obstruction; gastroenterostomy; gastrojejunostomy; meta-analysis; SURGICAL GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY; METAL STENT; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/ueg2.12576
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The technical and clinical effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided gastroenterostomy (GE) has been reported by several meta-analyses, but few of them have addressed the adverse events (AE). The goal of the current meta-analysis was to analyze the AEs associated with various types of EUS-GE. Methods: All relevant studies reporting the AEs with EUS-GE were searched from 2000 to 31st March 2023 in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. The event rates were pooled using a random effects model. Results: A total of 36 studies (n = 1846) were included in the meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis reports a pooled technical success rate of 96.9% (95.9-98.0; I-2 = 29.3%) with a pooled clinical success rate of 90.6% (88.5-92.7; I-2 = 60.9%). The pooled incidence of overall AEs with EUS-GE was 13.0% (10.3-15.7; I-2 = 69.7%), with the commonest being maldeployment of the stent, seen in 4.6% (3.2-6.0; I-2 = 50.6%). The pooled incidences of serious AE and procedure-related mortality were 1.2% (0.7-1.8; I-2 = 1.9%) and 0.3% (0.0-0.7; I-2 = 0.0%), respectively. Subgroup analysis of studies using only the free-hand technique showed a significantly lower overall AE and maldeployment but not serious AE and other individual AEs. The pooled incidences of delayed stent migration and stent occlusion were 0.5% (0.0-1.1; I-2 = 0.0%) and 0.8% (0.2-1.3; I-2 = 0.0%), respectively. Conclusion: Despite a technical and clinical success rate of >90%, AEs are seen in around one-seventh of the cases of EUS-GE, maldeployment being the commonest. However, the pooled incidence of serious AE and mortality remains low, which is reassuring.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 890
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kumar, Anand
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Atla, Pradeep R.
    McCabe, Evin J.
    Robbins, David H.
    Trindade, Arvind J.
    Benias, Petros C.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (04) : E448 - E458
  • [22] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for the treatment of gastric outlet obstruction secondary to acute pancreatitis
    Wannhoff, Andreas
    Canakis, Andrew
    Sharaiha, Reem Z.
    Fayyaz, Farimah
    Schlag, Christoph
    Sharma, Neil
    Elsayed, Ismaeil
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    Baron, Todd H.
    Caca, Karel
    Irani, Shayan S.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 57 (03) : 249 - 254
  • [23] Efficacy and Safety of EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khan, Ali T.
    Zhang, Xiaocen
    Herman, Michael
    Lung, Edward
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S537 - S538
  • [24] ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED GASTROENTEROSTOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Kwak, Nathan
    Vignesh, Shivakumar
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB318 - AB319
  • [25] Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy vs. Enteral Stenting for Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Retrospective Review
    Iqbal, Umair
    Berger, Andrea
    Confer, Bradley
    Diehl, David L.
    Khara, Harshit S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S536 - S537
  • [26] Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) in Gastric Outlet Obstruction (GOO): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Dhaliwal, Amaninder Jeet Singh
    Cormier, Ian
    Jhand, Aravdeep S.
    Rangray, Rajani
    Lyden, Elizabeth
    Bhat, Ishfaq
    Girotra, Mohit
    Singh, Shailender
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S449 - S450
  • [27] EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stenting for gastric outlet obstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Khan, Shahab R.
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Shah, Aun R.
    Bilal, Mohammad
    Ramai, Daryl
    Bhogal, Neil
    Dhindsa, Banreet
    Kassab, Lena L.
    Singh, Shailendra
    Ponnada, Suresh
    Nguyen, Andrew K.
    McDonough, Stephanie
    Adler, Douglas G.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (03) : E496 - E504
  • [28] EUS-Guided Gastroenterostomy (GE) versus Surgical Gastroenterostomy for Patients With Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jayaraj, Mahendran
    Singh, Dhruv P.
    Ravikumar, Naveen Prasad Gopalakrishnan
    Narala, Sai
    Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S512 - S512
  • [29] ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND-GUIDED GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY VERSUS SURGICAL GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY AND ENTERAL STENTING FOR THE TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT GASTRIC OUTLET OBSTRUCTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Benchaya, Joshua
    Chen, Yen-I
    Martel, Myriam
    Barkun, Alan N.
    Wyse, Jonathan
    Ferri, Lorenzo E.
    Miller, Corey S.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB480 - AB480
  • [30] EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a comprehensive meta-analysis
    Li, Jia-Su
    Lin, Kun
    Tang, Jian
    Liu, Feng
    Fang, Jun
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 32 (06) : 285 - 299