Structural Damage Identification Using Autoencoders: A Comparative Study

被引:1
|
作者
Neto, Marcos Spinola [1 ]
Finotti, Rafaelle [2 ]
Barbosa, Flavio [2 ]
Cury, Alexandre [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Juiz De Fora, Fac Engn, BR-36036900 Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Juiz De Fora, Fac Engn, Grad Program Civil Engn, BR-36036900 Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
关键词
structural health monitoring; damage detection; autoencoders; sparse; variational; convolutional; Hotelling; benchmark; NETWORK;
D O I
10.3390/buildings14072014
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Structural health monitoring (SHM) ensures the safety and reliability of civil infrastructure. Autoencoders, as unsupervised learning models, offer promise for SHM by learning data features and reducing dimensionality. However, comprehensive studies comparing autoencoder models in SHM are scarce. This study investigates the effectiveness of four autoencoder-based methodologies, combined with Hotelling's T2 statistical tool, to detect and quantify structural changes in three civil engineering structures. The methodologies are evaluated based on computational costs and their abilities to identify structural anomalies accurately. Signals from the structures, collected by accelerometers, feed the autoencoders for unsupervised classification. The latent layer values of the autoencoders are used as parameters in Hotelling's T2, and results are compared between classes to assess structural changes. Average execution times of each model were calculated for computational efficiency. Despite variations, computational cost did not hinder any methodology. The study demonstrates that the best fitting model, VAE-T2, outperforms its counterparts in identifying and quantifying structural changes. While the AE, SAE, and CAE models showed limitations in quantifying changes, they remain relevant for detecting anomalies. Continuous application and development of these techniques contribute to SHM advancements, enabling the increased safety, cost-effectiveness, and long-term durability of civil engineering structures.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural Condition Identification Using Roaming Damage Method
    Perera, Ricardo
    Sandercock, Sean
    Carnicero, Alberto
    EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING (EWSHM 2022), VOL 2, 2023, : 1087 - 1094
  • [22] Structural damage identification using frequency and modal changes
    Dems, K.
    Turant, J.
    BULLETIN OF THE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-TECHNICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 59 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [23] Structural damage identification using a global optimization technique
    Bayissa, Wirtu L.
    Haritos, Nicholas
    STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT, MONITORING AND IMPROVEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 530 - 536
  • [24] Structural damage identification using assigned partial eigenstructure
    Cobb, RG
    Liebst, BS
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1997, 35 (01) : 152 - 158
  • [25] Structural damage identification using embedded sensitivity functions
    Johnson, TJ
    Yang, CH
    Adams, DE
    Ciray, S
    SMART STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS 2004: SMART STRUCTURES AND INTEGRATED SYSTEMS, 2004, 5390 : 532 - 541
  • [26] Structural damage identification and location using grammian matrices
    Bueno, D. D.
    Marqui, C. R.
    Lopes, V., Jr.
    Brennan, M. J.
    Inman, Daniel J.
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2012, 19 (03) : 287 - 299
  • [27] Structural damage identification using assigned partial eigenstructure
    U.S. Air Force Inst of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, United States
    AIAA J, 1 (152-158):
  • [28] Structural damage identification using system dynamic properties
    Ge, M
    Lui, EM
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2005, 83 (27) : 2185 - 2196
  • [29] Structural damage identification using gravitational search algorithm
    Liu, J. K.
    Wei, Z. T.
    Lu, Z. R.
    Ou, Y. J.
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2016, 60 (04) : 729 - 747