Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

被引:826
|
作者
Cai, Xiqian [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Yi [3 ]
Wu, Mingqin [4 ]
Yu, Linhui [5 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Econ, Inst Econ, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Wang Yanan Inst Studies Econ, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Econ, Singapore, Singapore
[4] South China Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Foreign direct investment; Pollution haven effect; Difference-in-difference-in-differences estimation; Two control zones; POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; PLANT LOCATION; GROWTH; MODELS; BIRTHS; STATES; POLICY; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether environmental regulation affects inbound foreign direct investment. The identification uses the Two Control Zones (TCZ) policy implemented by the Chinese government in 1998, in which tougher environmental regulations were imposed in TCZ cities but not others. Our difference in-difference-in-differences estimation explores three-dimension variations; specifically, city (i.e., TCZ versus non-TCZ cities), industry (i.e., more polluting industries relative to less polluting ones), and year (i.e., before and after the TCZ policy). We find that tougher environmental regulation leads to less foreign direct investment. Meanwhile, we find that foreign multinationals from countries with better environmental protections than China are insensitive to the toughening environmental regulation, while those from countries with worse environmental protections than China show strong negative responses. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 85
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条