Researcher-Practitioner Collaboration in Action Design Research

被引:0
|
作者
Cronholm, Stefan [1 ]
Gobel, Hannes [1 ]
Shrestha, Anup [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Boras, Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Business, Toowoomba, Australia
关键词
researcher-practitioner collaboration; action design research; ADR projects; design science research; academy-industry collaboration; SCIENCE RESEARCH; GROUNDED THEORY; DOMINANT LOGIC; INFORMATION; FIELD;
D O I
10.3127/ajis.v28.4281
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Action Design Research (ADR) is a well-known research method within Design Science Research (DSR). An essential characteristic of the ADR method is the need for researcher- practitioner collaboration (RPC). While there is abundant research on RPC regarding information systems projects in general concerning explanatory and normative knowledge, there is very limited prescriptive knowledge on how to execute RPC in ADR projects. Successful collaboration in ADR projects is imperative since the development of sociotechnical IT artefacts requires frequent interaction in organisational contexts. However, RPC can be hard to manage due to competing interests. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to present prescriptive knowledge for how to manage RPC. We have analysed a collaborative ADR project consisting of several researchers and practitioners. Based on a grounded theory approach, we have developed theoretical models based on challenges identified in an ADR project. The models provide prescriptive knowledge regarding: shape the IT artefact based on organisational intervention, exploit the mutual dependency between developing design principles and IT artefacts, and contextualise and generalise learning. Each model involves logical relationships between: conditions for the challenges, actions taken to address the challenges and consequences of the actions taken. The guidelines were deducted from the models and consist of recommendations that could be considered in future ADR projects.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RESEARCHER VERSUS PRACTITIONER - PROBLEMS IN SOCIAL ACTION RESEARCH
    ARONSON, SH
    SHERWOOD, CC
    SOCIAL WORK, 1967, 12 (04) : 89 - 96
  • [42] "UNIFIED": Bridging the Researcher-Practitioner Divide in Mind, Brain, and Education
    Hobbiss, Michael H.
    Massonnie, Jessica
    Tokuhama-Espinosa, Tracey
    Gittner, Alastair
    Lemos, Monica Arson de Sousa
    Tovazzi, Alice
    Hindley, Charlotte
    Baker, Sharon
    Sumeracki, Megan A.
    Wassenaar, Thomas
    Gous, Ignatius
    MIND BRAIN AND EDUCATION, 2019, 13 (04) : 298 - 312
  • [43] A comparison of researcher-practitioner collaborations in library and information science, education, and sociology
    Chang, Yu-Wei
    JOURNAL OF LIBRARIANSHIP AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2019, 51 (01) : 208 - 217
  • [44] Closing the researcher-practitioner gap An exploration of the impact of an AHRC networking grant
    Hall, Hazel
    Cruickshank, Peter
    Ryan, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2019, 75 (05) : 1056 - 1081
  • [45] Researcher-practitioner: an unholy marriage? (vol 30, pg 175, 2004)
    Fryer, EM
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2004, 30 (03) : 345 - 345
  • [46] 'English as an additional language', 'multilingual', and 'vulnerable': a reflexive account of the labelling practices surrounding school pupils in a researcher-practitioner collaboration
    Andrade, Gonzalo Perez
    King, Hannah M.
    LANGUAGE AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION, 2024, 24 (05) : 458 - 474
  • [47] Improving the Forensic Documentation of Injuries Through Alternate Light: A Researcher-Practitioner Partnership
    Scafide, Katherine N.
    Ekroos, Rachell A.
    Mallinson, R. Kevin
    Alshahrani, Abeer
    Volz, Jessica
    Holbrook, Debra S.
    Hayat, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC NURSING, 2023, 19 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [48] When Rigor and Relevance Meet: Experience from a Fruitful Researcher-Practitioner Partnership
    Grant, Gerald
    Collins, Robert
    AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
  • [49] Making the most of children centre management data: a researcher-practitioner partnership approach
    Tunstill, Jane
    Blewett, James
    JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS SERVICES, 2016, 11 (01) : 25 - 37
  • [50] EVALUATION OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN WATER-RESOURCES PLANNING - A RESEARCHER-PRACTITIONER DIALOG
    SYME, GJ
    SADLER, BS
    EVALUATION REVIEW, 1994, 18 (05) : 523 - 542